{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA","short_pith_number":"pith:GXEAZJQ3","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"35c80ca61b129616afc7043cc69781502df1b56a4a55a695a06c26e1e2810fcd","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2307.09291","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Model-free selective inference under covariate shift via weighted conformal p-values","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.AP","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Emmanuel J. Cand\\`es, Ying Jin","submitted_at":"2023-07-18T14:33:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces novel weighted conformal p-values and methods for model-free selective inference. The problem is as follows: given test units with covariates $X$ and missing responses $Y$, how do we select units for which the responses $Y$ are larger than user-specified values while controlling the proportion of false positives? Can we achieve this without any modeling assumptions on the data and without any restriction on the model for predicting the responses? Last, methods should be applicable when there is a covariate shift between training and test data, which commonly occurs in pra"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2307.09291","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-07-18T14:33:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.ST","stat.AP","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"82d2108bad07fe359417a5bf475e0a764263a3fd050564d7bc3b6ac3729e31af","abstract_canon_sha256":"19a88275eff40d4a4015549f281b3278ab25f4db19d3eadc6078b32b102ec319"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.550331Z","signature_b64":"cfaC1gPiXufAtCGHP1D7Tcug0sWMGxLIWf/Cs9u6D3Mwy4xy/KWd7Q4l5E4FuF7T4Q8xO2CG5nsxD1QfMzDtCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"35c80ca61b129616afc7043cc69781502df1b56a4a55a695a06c26e1e2810fcd","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549850Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549850Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Model-free selective inference under covariate shift via weighted conformal p-values","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.ST","stat.AP","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Emmanuel J. Cand\\`es, Ying Jin","submitted_at":"2023-07-18T14:33:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper introduces novel weighted conformal p-values and methods for model-free selective inference. The problem is as follows: given test units with covariates $X$ and missing responses $Y$, how do we select units for which the responses $Y$ are larger than user-specified values while controlling the proportion of false positives? Can we achieve this without any modeling assumptions on the data and without any restriction on the model for predicting the responses? Last, methods should be applicable when there is a covariate shift between training and test data, which commonly occurs in pra"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2307.09291","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2307.09291/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2307.09291","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2307.09291v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2307.09291","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GXEAZJQ3CKLB","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6H","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GXEAZJQ3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.02206","citing_title":"Prediction Sets for Counterfactual Decisions: Coverage, Optimality, and Conformal Prediction","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20726","citing_title":"Everywhere Valid Bounds on False Discovery Proportions in Conformal Inference","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20726","citing_title":"Everywhere Valid Bounds on False Discovery Proportions in Conformal Inference","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.03297","citing_title":"Feedback-Enhanced Online Multiple Testing with Applications to Conformal Selection","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06479","citing_title":"Risk-Controlled Post-Processing of Decision Policies","ref_index":183,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GXEAZJQ3"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GXEAZJQ3","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2307.09291&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GXEAZJQ3CKLBNL6HAQ6MNF4BKA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:54:20.549906+00:00"}