{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB","short_pith_number":"pith:GXKE4MBS","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"35d44e30321d8ce6a4d426cbf56881287bbcd1cd7e577d710764e75a8fd5e87a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1609.09028","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Stance Classification in Rumours as a Sequential Task Exploiting the Tree Structure of Social Media Conversations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arkaitz Zubiaga, Elena Kochkina, Maria Liakata, Michal Lukasik, Rob Procter","submitted_at":"2016-09-28T18:24:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Rumour stance classification, the task that determines if each tweet in a collection discussing a rumour is supporting, denying, questioning or simply commenting on the rumour, has been attracting substantial interest. Here we introduce a novel approach that makes use of the sequence of transitions observed in tree-structured conversation threads in Twitter. The conversation threads are formed by harvesting users' replies to one another, which results in a nested tree-like structure. Previous work addressing the stance classification task has treated each tweet as a separate unit. Here we anal"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1609.09028","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2016-09-28T18:24:12Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SI"],"title_canon_sha256":"d1b625856fc0831fca51786605eed34a7ca2235d71a2d6123e2abd8f9286c709","abstract_canon_sha256":"5237e2b14529ea04690cb236f747189cec49f959711c608ea83a0f77dd133602"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355919Z","signature_b64":"YqLCffOvlHOb/wkDe7fl8VBGDUPdD9o4tkZU3uDpYU8h4JFDEJ/BEWMFPPyyJx2LpNfAoSpTQVgR6vYX1/CqAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"35d44e30321d8ce6a4d426cbf56881287bbcd1cd7e577d710764e75a8fd5e87a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355230Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355230Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Stance Classification in Rumours as a Sequential Task Exploiting the Tree Structure of Social Media Conversations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Arkaitz Zubiaga, Elena Kochkina, Maria Liakata, Michal Lukasik, Rob Procter","submitted_at":"2016-09-28T18:24:12Z","abstract_excerpt":"Rumour stance classification, the task that determines if each tweet in a collection discussing a rumour is supporting, denying, questioning or simply commenting on the rumour, has been attracting substantial interest. Here we introduce a novel approach that makes use of the sequence of transitions observed in tree-structured conversation threads in Twitter. The conversation threads are formed by harvesting users' replies to one another, which results in a nested tree-like structure. Previous work addressing the stance classification task has treated each tweet as a separate unit. Here we anal"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1609.09028","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1609.09028","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355341+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1609.09028v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355341+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1609.09028","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355341+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GXKE4MBSDWGO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:19.053100+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GXKE4MBSDWGONJGU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:19.053100+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GXKE4MBS","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:19.053100+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GXKE4MBS"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GXKE4MBS","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1609.09028&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GXKE4MBSDWGONJGUE3F7K2EBFB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355341+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:02:36.355341+00:00"}