{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2006:GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY","short_pith_number":"pith:GZVXPPZD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"366b77bf23f45ca17ba0ee9905be744e2fc8d621005ffa1688e90fe5e8873200","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"hep-lat/0602005","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"QCD at Zero Baryon Density and the Polyakov Loop Paradox","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Ph. de Forcrand (ETH & CERN), S. Kratochvila (ETH)","submitted_at":"2006-02-02T19:27:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare the grand canonical partition function at fixed chemical potential mu with the canonical partition function at fixed baryon number B, formally and by numerical simulations at mu=0 and B=0 with four flavours of staggered quarks. We verify that the free energy densities are equal in the thermodynamic limit, and show that they can be well described by the hadron resonance gas at T < T_c and by the free fermion gas at T>T_c.\n  Small differences between the two ensembles, for thermodynamic observables characterising the deconfinement phase transition, vanish with increasing lattice size."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"hep-lat/0602005","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"2006-02-02T19:27:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"3fcb4049fa10c7ed18d6b3b63a5de828c24120593b7e51170fda8c0a5cd2252c","abstract_canon_sha256":"da01b214eb16c635dc7797cbbc9027ebf5476c5cdfee3197dd52d132ea92596b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.211132Z","signature_b64":"lYabSQ0yBZ2XLZ59/ss3K8Em/dm6LXLtswWybFkz1wdhzi2h8Wkf3CMCyc3VuzSe+m/bo0kgHwj6K/hPuNGTCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"366b77bf23f45ca17ba0ee9905be744e2fc8d621005ffa1688e90fe5e8873200","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210795Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210795Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"QCD at Zero Baryon Density and the Polyakov Loop Paradox","license":"","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Ph. de Forcrand (ETH & CERN), S. Kratochvila (ETH)","submitted_at":"2006-02-02T19:27:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"We compare the grand canonical partition function at fixed chemical potential mu with the canonical partition function at fixed baryon number B, formally and by numerical simulations at mu=0 and B=0 with four flavours of staggered quarks. We verify that the free energy densities are equal in the thermodynamic limit, and show that they can be well described by the hadron resonance gas at T < T_c and by the free fermion gas at T>T_c.\n  Small differences between the two ensembles, for thermodynamic observables characterising the deconfinement phase transition, vanish with increasing lattice size."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"hep-lat/0602005","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/hep-lat/0602005/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"hep-lat/0602005","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"hep-lat/0602005v1","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.hep-lat/0602005","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"GZVXPPZD6ROK","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"GZVXPPZD","created_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19287","citing_title":"The canonical approach at high temperature revisited","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GZVXPPZD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/GZVXPPZD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=hep-lat/0602005&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/GZVXPPZD6ROKC65A52MQLPTUJY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-04T17:01:37.210852+00:00"}