{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6","short_pith_number":"pith:H2MPVF5V","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3e98fa97b5911f75c5ad7907c19c808787ef1fd36b47ff3f614a54311f8a99e0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.05863","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"How Well Can LLMs Negotiate? NegotiationArena Platform and Analysis","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Dan Jurafsky, Federico Bianchi, Jacopo Tagliabue, James Zou, Mert Yuksekgonul, Patrick John Chia","submitted_at":"2024-02-08T17:51:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Negotiation is the basis of social interactions; humans negotiate everything from the price of cars to how to share common resources. With rapidly growing interest in using large language models (LLMs) to act as agents on behalf of human users, such LLM agents would also need to be able to negotiate. In this paper, we study how well LLMs can negotiate with each other. We develop NegotiationArena: a flexible framework for evaluating and probing the negotiation abilities of LLM agents. We implemented three types of scenarios in NegotiationArena to assess LLM's behaviors in allocating shared reso"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.05863","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-02-08T17:51:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"440c8ba22d1e243ea273180614247501d0eccf8af4b6f25016cab72f9e1a03b9","abstract_canon_sha256":"df15c616f3b303101fc66ea6b8fffba9f6f1b05583d58bc997f43c38b328c85b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253704Z","signature_b64":"s+KaSv4fwCnEFcx+V39NdwL+IQveScpMHX78GNVZhdROO+Zbku5HVtdKeRcrSpeaDW501pHuti5G0MyI/xtbBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3e98fa97b5911f75c5ad7907c19c808787ef1fd36b47ff3f614a54311f8a99e0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253217Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253217Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"How Well Can LLMs Negotiate? NegotiationArena Platform and Analysis","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Dan Jurafsky, Federico Bianchi, Jacopo Tagliabue, James Zou, Mert Yuksekgonul, Patrick John Chia","submitted_at":"2024-02-08T17:51:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Negotiation is the basis of social interactions; humans negotiate everything from the price of cars to how to share common resources. With rapidly growing interest in using large language models (LLMs) to act as agents on behalf of human users, such LLM agents would also need to be able to negotiate. In this paper, we study how well LLMs can negotiate with each other. We develop NegotiationArena: a flexible framework for evaluating and probing the negotiation abilities of LLM agents. We implemented three types of scenarios in NegotiationArena to assess LLM's behaviors in allocating shared reso"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.05863","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.05863/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.05863","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.05863v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.05863","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"H2MPVF5VSEPX","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"H2MPVF5V","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":15,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.05863","citing_title":"Strategic Bargaining in Multi-Buyer Markets: Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards for LLM Negotiations","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22748","citing_title":"Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.17657","citing_title":"Using Cognitive Models to Improve Language Model Simulation of Human Persuasion Games","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.27397","citing_title":"SidConArena: An Environment Evaluating Agents in Open-Ended,Positive-Sum Bargaining Game","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28456","citing_title":"Is Lying an Emergent Behaviour in LLMs? Evidence from Gaslighting AI agents in a Sustainability Game","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11217","citing_title":"Preregistration for Experiments with AI Agents","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23262","citing_title":"Design and Report Benchmarks for Knowledge Work","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.16810","citing_title":"AI Realtor: Towards Grounded Persuasive Language Generation for Automated Copywriting","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19351","citing_title":"PAVE: A Cognitive Architecture for Legitimate Violation in Generative Agent Societies","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.08565","citing_title":"Moral Susceptibility and Robustness under Persona Role-Play in Large Language Models","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2601.10102","citing_title":"When Identity Overrides Incentives: Representational Choices as Governance Decisions in Multi-Agent LLM Systems","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.22748","citing_title":"Agentic World Modeling: Foundations, Capabilities, Laws, and Beyond","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19260","citing_title":"Understanding the Mechanism of Altruism in Large Language Models","ref_index":253,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11427","citing_title":"METRO: Towards Strategy Induction from Expert Dialogue Transcripts for Non-collaborative Dialogues","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07301","citing_title":"SOM: Structured Opponent Modeling for LLM-based Agents via Structural Causal Model","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H2MPVF5V"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H2MPVF5V","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.05863&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/H2MPVF5VSEPXLRNNPED4DHEAQ6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:44:46.253263+00:00"}