{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O","short_pith_number":"pith:H4ODC7IU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3f1c317d14a326f663efeeae7642fedb971a8e1f4632721b299b78078d855463","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2604.19005","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Debating the Unspoken: Role-Anchored Multi-Agent Reasoning for Half-Truth Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Role-anchored multi-agent debate detects half-truths by exposing omitted context in claims.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anthony K.H. Tung, Hang Feng, Yirui Zhang, Yixuan Tang","submitted_at":"2026-04-21T02:46:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Half-truths, claims that are factually correct yet misleading due to omitted context, remain a blind spot for fact verification systems focused on explicit falsehoods. Addressing such omission-based manipulation requires reasoning not only about what is said, but also about what is left unsaid. We propose RADAR, a role-anchored multi-agent debate framework for omission-aware fact verification under realistic, noisy retrieval. RADAR assigns complementary roles to a Politician and a Scientist, who reason adversarially over shared retrieved evidence, moderated by a neutral Judge. A dual-threshold"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2604.19005","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2026-04-21T02:46:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"32450ae382c22c23e44ab0f3575a52c2cc4f778c8782cf3040aba19d6d4f850f","abstract_canon_sha256":"7d3a00818b47c75820fc258af17d37b8f7daf536ddd3d5cc86058088b1ae867c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.949125Z","signature_b64":"1Kq29tF8uNM5OHMXqW5p+/x3VCM6EC2ckp049rBKsttcdl6dXbAQjSRS12MUG4br4uCGTwZcyTlqOO3M1c+RAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3f1c317d14a326f663efeeae7642fedb971a8e1f4632721b299b78078d855463","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948730Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948730Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Debating the Unspoken: Role-Anchored Multi-Agent Reasoning for Half-Truth Detection","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Role-anchored multi-agent debate detects half-truths by exposing omitted context in claims.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anthony K.H. Tung, Hang Feng, Yirui Zhang, Yixuan Tang","submitted_at":"2026-04-21T02:46:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"Half-truths, claims that are factually correct yet misleading due to omitted context, remain a blind spot for fact verification systems focused on explicit falsehoods. Addressing such omission-based manipulation requires reasoning not only about what is said, but also about what is left unsaid. We propose RADAR, a role-anchored multi-agent debate framework for omission-aware fact verification under realistic, noisy retrieval. RADAR assigns complementary roles to a Politician and a Scientist, who reason adversarially over shared retrieved evidence, moderated by a neutral Judge. A dual-threshold"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Experiments show that RADAR consistently outperforms strong single- and multi-agent baselines across datasets and backbones, improving omission detection accuracy while reducing reasoning cost.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That complementary role assignment and adversarial debate over shared retrieved evidence, combined with dual-threshold early termination, reliably uncovers omitted context without introducing new biases or requiring perfect retrieval.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"RADAR is a role-anchored multi-agent debate framework that improves half-truth detection by reasoning about omitted context in noisy retrieved evidence.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Role-anchored multi-agent debate detects half-truths by exposing omitted context in claims.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"a415dafafb805ac6705867db545a83d739cb1adba8b1747f09ab38388a44e005"},"source":{"id":"2604.19005","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"1c31d13b-c1fe-49c8-9cf5-98455a61bc85","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-10T02:37:38.351275Z","strongest_claim":"Experiments show that RADAR consistently outperforms strong single- and multi-agent baselines across datasets and backbones, improving omission detection accuracy while reducing reasoning cost.","one_line_summary":"RADAR is a role-anchored multi-agent debate framework that improves half-truth detection by reasoning about omitted context in noisy retrieved evidence.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That complementary role assignment and adversarial debate over shared retrieved evidence, combined with dual-threshold early termination, reliably uncovers omitted context without introducing new biases or requiring perfect retrieval.","pith_extraction_headline":"Role-anchored multi-agent debate detects half-truths by exposing omitted context in claims."},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2604.19005/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[{"name":"doi_compliance","ran_at":"2026-05-20T03:25:15.292392Z","status":"completed","version":"1.0.0","findings_count":0}],"snapshot_sha256":"9eb1a1d49ad1fb2d57c4561603c5078d3f7aa78339f099de4e1c6264dfb943b6"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2604.19005","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2604.19005v2","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2604.19005","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"H4ODC7IUUMTP","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"H4ODC7IU","created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O","json":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H4ODC7IU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H4ODC7IU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2604.19005&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/H4ODC7IUUMTPMY7P52XHMQX63O/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-03T01:05:13.948783+00:00"}