{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH","short_pith_number":"pith:H4X77Y5Y","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3f2fffe3b8492840954f78054cf43f51fb1a3a56c04ef224e5763a52fec9bc98","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.04073","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An Empirical Study on the Impact of Code Duplication-aware Refactoring Practices on Quality Metrics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Eman Abdullah AlOmar","submitted_at":"2025-02-06T13:34:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: Code refactoring is widely recognized as an essential software engineering practice that improves the understandability and maintainability of source code. Several studies attempted to detect refactoring activities through mining software repositories, allowing one to collect, analyze, and get actionable data-driven insights about refactoring practices within software projects. Objective: Our goal is to identify, among the various quality models presented in the literature, the ones that align with the developer's vision of eliminating duplicates of code, when they explicitly mention "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.04073","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-02-06T13:34:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"80be7a7b77b32aa1073d1b61d31ac2a04e978a0c618d96e5e5d96c5932bee673","abstract_canon_sha256":"0c1b2db5a6dbf1a24a5c6826f9624def3685e2f0760c1b33203b47a1a055d02f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771586Z","signature_b64":"1i4atNTP9rJL2D5bJn6PbA2P6XT4rgjpdLnwCfHI4eADxEHHlVGBL7Y5ZMMpRPx9EnnxFTMfLya7mxTnhglpAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3f2fffe3b8492840954f78054cf43f51fb1a3a56c04ef224e5763a52fec9bc98","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771200Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771200Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An Empirical Study on the Impact of Code Duplication-aware Refactoring Practices on Quality Metrics","license":"http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Eman Abdullah AlOmar","submitted_at":"2025-02-06T13:34:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Context: Code refactoring is widely recognized as an essential software engineering practice that improves the understandability and maintainability of source code. Several studies attempted to detect refactoring activities through mining software repositories, allowing one to collect, analyze, and get actionable data-driven insights about refactoring practices within software projects. Objective: Our goal is to identify, among the various quality models presented in the literature, the ones that align with the developer's vision of eliminating duplicates of code, when they explicitly mention "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.04073","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.04073/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.04073","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.04073v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.04073","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"H4X77Y5YJEUE","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKP","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"H4X77Y5Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.20462","citing_title":"Reducing Maintenance Burden in Behaviour-Driven Development: A Paraphrase-Robust Duplicate-Step Detector with a 1.1M-Step Open Benchmark","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH","json":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H4X77Y5Y"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H4X77Y5Y","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.04073&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/H4X77Y5YJEUEBFKPPACUZ5B7KH/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:10:33.771247+00:00"}