{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4","short_pith_number":"pith:H53RN7T7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3f7716fe7f9fbf65f978145e59023d1f11621fd89250a7c21ddb4eb3614ecd0e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2002.08200","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Sensitivity of the lower-edge of the pair instability black hole mass gap to the treatment of time dependent convection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.HE"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"M. Renzo, P. Marchant, R. J. Farmer, S. E. de Mink, S. Justham, Y. G\\\"otberg","submitted_at":"2020-02-19T14:14:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Gravitational-wave detections are now probing the black hole (BH) mass distribution, including the predicted pair-instability mass gap. These data require robust quantitative predictions, which are challenging to obtain. The most massive BH progenitors experience episodic mass ejections on timescales shorter than the convective turn-over timescale. This invalidates the steady-state assumption on which the classic mixing-length theory relies. We compare the final BH masses computed with two different versions of the stellar evolutionary code \\texttt{MESA}: (i) using the default implementation o"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2002.08200","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","submitted_at":"2020-02-19T14:14:05Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.HE"],"title_canon_sha256":"def8f509bb8c2f75518a08f7a6825916e30db5a50e4d1e4ef5c2743c1f6dd693","abstract_canon_sha256":"af02526bf5b27b88a9002310c76e62983bb5e61c262026248b884109e76887ba"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.556106Z","signature_b64":"JuqSzV022Knnyh2zVoRW1i9thkNUnTWjC8H9sxHfUGMxvOfERMjsnxRl1JjoI2x4Iac72BvjH3IV1FodxKnHBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3f7716fe7f9fbf65f978145e59023d1f11621fd89250a7c21ddb4eb3614ecd0e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555588Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555588Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Sensitivity of the lower-edge of the pair instability black hole mass gap to the treatment of time dependent convection","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.HE"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.SR","authors_text":"M. Renzo, P. Marchant, R. J. Farmer, S. E. de Mink, S. Justham, Y. G\\\"otberg","submitted_at":"2020-02-19T14:14:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Gravitational-wave detections are now probing the black hole (BH) mass distribution, including the predicted pair-instability mass gap. These data require robust quantitative predictions, which are challenging to obtain. The most massive BH progenitors experience episodic mass ejections on timescales shorter than the convective turn-over timescale. This invalidates the steady-state assumption on which the classic mixing-length theory relies. We compare the final BH masses computed with two different versions of the stellar evolutionary code \\texttt{MESA}: (i) using the default implementation o"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2002.08200","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2002.08200/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2002.08200","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2002.08200v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2002.08200","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"H53RN7T7T67W","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"H53RN7T7T67WL6LY","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"H53RN7T7","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.11282","citing_title":"Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4","json":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H53RN7T7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H53RN7T7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2002.08200&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/H53RN7T7T67WL6LYCRPFSAR5D4/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:00.555654+00:00"}