{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3","short_pith_number":"pith:H5JRG2QV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3f53136a1510a8789b6f23f9b7d7f06efdada7ebc7ef5c5b83144581c799aea5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1909.02219","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Static charged dilaton black hole cannot be overcharged by gedanken experiments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Banglin Deng, Jie Jiang, Zhaohui Chen","submitted_at":"2019-09-05T05:59:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the new version of the gedanken experiments proposed recently by Sorce and Wald to overcharge a static charged dilaton black hole. First of all, we derive the first-order and second-order perturbation inequalities in the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravitational theory based on the Iyer-Wald formalism. As a result, we find that the weak cosmic censorship conjecture associated with this black hole can be protected after taking into account the second-order perturbation inequality, although violated by the scene without considering this inequality. Therefore, there is no violation of th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1909.02219","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2019-09-05T05:59:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"09068e9bc6342cfd8a8d787a52e12dd39b3d3b13871d77bde308dbe86d70a4e7","abstract_canon_sha256":"f387f537f04bd704f43e876800119d11981f1093dc86271206eb4926a4ca34a6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242545Z","signature_b64":"eZRvIAXOqnSD2jBDJDaSuIIg+wW8bJYTraGmwDEGkeZa160jXuqadrl5V8/hI5h9QyDipzAaHjKgYUWyqqi+AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3f53136a1510a8789b6f23f9b7d7f06efdada7ebc7ef5c5b83144581c799aea5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242124Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242124Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Static charged dilaton black hole cannot be overcharged by gedanken experiments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Banglin Deng, Jie Jiang, Zhaohui Chen","submitted_at":"2019-09-05T05:59:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"We consider the new version of the gedanken experiments proposed recently by Sorce and Wald to overcharge a static charged dilaton black hole. First of all, we derive the first-order and second-order perturbation inequalities in the Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravitational theory based on the Iyer-Wald formalism. As a result, we find that the weak cosmic censorship conjecture associated with this black hole can be protected after taking into account the second-order perturbation inequality, although violated by the scene without considering this inequality. Therefore, there is no violation of th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1909.02219","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1909.02219/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1909.02219","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1909.02219v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1909.02219","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"H5JRG2QVCCUH","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3P","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"H5JRG2QV","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.13592","citing_title":"Trapped Surface as a Cosmic Censor","ref_index":25,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H5JRG2QV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H5JRG2QV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1909.02219&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/H5JRG2QVCCUHRG3PEP43PV7QN3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:07:26.242178+00:00"}