{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT","short_pith_number":"pith:H7KJ23DB","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3fd49d6c61400c983a6e5d04d1282a14e6a5834cdf826223e063d8849281e223","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.00257","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"EQUATOR: A Deterministic Framework for Evaluating LLM Reasoning with Open-Ended Questions. # v1.0.0-beta","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Rahul Murugan, Raymond Bernard, Shaina Raza (PhD), Subhabrata Das (PhD)","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T03:56:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the remarkable coherence of Large Language Models (LLMs), existing evaluation methods often suffer from fluency bias and rely heavily on multiple-choice formats, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy and complex reasoning effectively. LLMs thus frequently generate factually inaccurate responses, especially in complex reasoning tasks, highlighting two prominent challenges: (1) the inadequacy of existing methods to evaluate reasoning and factual accuracy effectively, and (2) the reliance on human evaluators for nuanced judgment, as illustrated by Williams and Huckle (2024)[1], w"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.00257","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T03:56:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e1348bd85164814880023ef41390f1eed32b2fe7ddb523759eceb6de66d65b5c","abstract_canon_sha256":"7d35bca69dd34f3f7aa2be954822225c6f3a93d4709b254b8dbd392861fd9120"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.776435Z","signature_b64":"Sj8WPPbxDVWohm9iyNYuTjbm8gg4LKIfzppJRE1orDbi9RUbRSrOTccLqtx0yJjxRezF38A2EFjRwrfSAbHnBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3fd49d6c61400c983a6e5d04d1282a14e6a5834cdf826223e063d8849281e223","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775935Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775935Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"EQUATOR: A Deterministic Framework for Evaluating LLM Reasoning with Open-Ended Questions. # v1.0.0-beta","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Rahul Murugan, Raymond Bernard, Shaina Raza (PhD), Subhabrata Das (PhD)","submitted_at":"2024-12-31T03:56:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite the remarkable coherence of Large Language Models (LLMs), existing evaluation methods often suffer from fluency bias and rely heavily on multiple-choice formats, making it difficult to assess factual accuracy and complex reasoning effectively. LLMs thus frequently generate factually inaccurate responses, especially in complex reasoning tasks, highlighting two prominent challenges: (1) the inadequacy of existing methods to evaluate reasoning and factual accuracy effectively, and (2) the reliance on human evaluators for nuanced judgment, as illustrated by Williams and Huckle (2024)[1], w"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.00257","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.00257/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.00257","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.00257v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.00257","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"H7KJ23DBIAGJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTO","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"H7KJ23DB","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11643","citing_title":"Improving Cross-Format Robustness in Language Models with Multi-Format Training","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15486","citing_title":"Hybrid LLM-based Intelligent Framework for Robot Task Scheduling","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H7KJ23DB"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/H7KJ23DB","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.00257&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/H7KJ23DBIAGJQOTOLUCNCKBKCT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:55:41.775994+00:00"}