{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD","short_pith_number":"pith:HC5TOQFZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"38bb3740b9f8874c7817803a3ac62c10c38ad726fbf1174a2718989d40db6989","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2607.26280","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Bias at the Borderline: Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt in Peer Review?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Hazem Ibrahim, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T21:22:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study peer review at ICLR, a large machine-learning conference whose complete review record, including rejected submissions, is public. Reviewers score each submission; for the borderline band whose scores do not settle an outcome, an area chair makes a discretionary accept-or-reject call. We ask whether that call is even-handed: do authors from prestigious institutions, WEIRD countries, or all-male teams get the benefit of the doubt at the margin? Across ICLR 2019-2025 (31,711 submissions; 10,416 borderline), borderline papers without a top-25-institution author are accepted at a 0.5 to 1."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2607.26280","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T21:22:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b3b724e8d14246e5d73f81fddbe76b7ab09450db99a4a4a5255c57ce3695f0de","abstract_canon_sha256":"5315cfa1026e3050aaa1f370f9381de9cecc18098d2758746621d57fdb3a139e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"38bb3740b9f8874c7817803a3ac62c10c38ad726fbf1174a2718989d40db6989","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.517359Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.517359Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Bias at the Borderline: Who Gets the Benefit of the Doubt in Peer Review?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Hazem Ibrahim, Talal Rahwan, Yasir Zaki","submitted_at":"2026-07-28T21:22:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study peer review at ICLR, a large machine-learning conference whose complete review record, including rejected submissions, is public. Reviewers score each submission; for the borderline band whose scores do not settle an outcome, an area chair makes a discretionary accept-or-reject call. We ask whether that call is even-handed: do authors from prestigious institutions, WEIRD countries, or all-male teams get the benefit of the doubt at the margin? Across ICLR 2019-2025 (31,711 submissions; 10,416 borderline), borderline papers without a top-25-institution author are accepted at a 0.5 to 1."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2607.26280","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2607.26280/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2607.26280","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2607.26280v1","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2607.26280","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HC5TOQFZ7CDU","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AX","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HC5TOQFZ","created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HC5TOQFZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HC5TOQFZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2607.26280&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HC5TOQFZ7CDUY6AXQA5DVRRMCD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-30T01:17:54.522619+00:00"}