{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2016:HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2","short_pith_number":"pith:HDUS7RTV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"38e92fc67506a116be09aa24993647069946a23cc896b171f886ba833c4f690d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1601.00900","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Too good to be true: when overwhelming evidence fails to convince","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Andrew Allison, Bruce Davis, Derek Abbott, Fran\\c{c}ois Chapeau-Blondeau, Lachlan J. Gunn, Mark McDonnell","submitted_at":"2016-01-05T16:44:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Is it possible for a large sequence of measurements or observations, which support a hypothesis, to counterintuitively decrease our confidence? Can unanimous support be too good to be true? The assumption of independence is often made in good faith, however rarely is consideration given to whether a systemic failure has occurred.\n  Taking this into account can cause certainty in a hypothesis to decrease as the evidence for it becomes apparently stronger. We perform a probabilistic Bayesian analysis of this effect with examples based on (i) archaeological evidence, (ii) weighing of legal eviden"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1601.00900","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2016-01-05T16:44:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e89c40e5da129fddb779ec73e171bb83f202e598319f19f3f221b4a5a770cb1a","abstract_canon_sha256":"425323e1f5b34067f6daf436d16220459adf67dadb0bbc2e60e47203b491fa19"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894972Z","signature_b64":"ruvU+7hxhWLSXdoFGPkHnN7iIQfNOyz6LPpGdDa69oqnXMbl42sCNIdAZ2DVAJEcrkBfPSgQIG7ePuSD72YxCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"38e92fc67506a116be09aa24993647069946a23cc896b171f886ba833c4f690d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894147Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894147Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Too good to be true: when overwhelming evidence fails to convince","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Andrew Allison, Bruce Davis, Derek Abbott, Fran\\c{c}ois Chapeau-Blondeau, Lachlan J. Gunn, Mark McDonnell","submitted_at":"2016-01-05T16:44:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Is it possible for a large sequence of measurements or observations, which support a hypothesis, to counterintuitively decrease our confidence? Can unanimous support be too good to be true? The assumption of independence is often made in good faith, however rarely is consideration given to whether a systemic failure has occurred.\n  Taking this into account can cause certainty in a hypothesis to decrease as the evidence for it becomes apparently stronger. We perform a probabilistic Bayesian analysis of this effect with examples based on (i) archaeological evidence, (ii) weighing of legal eviden"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1601.00900","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1601.00900","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894303+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1601.00900v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894303+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1601.00900","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894303+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HDUS7RTVA2QR","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:19.053100+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:19.053100+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HDUS7RTV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:30:19.053100+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HDUS7RTV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HDUS7RTV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1601.00900&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HDUS7RTVA2QRNPQJVISJSNSHA2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894303+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:16:14.894303+00:00"}