{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY","short_pith_number":"pith:HFMRZ7QN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"39591cfe0dc71efbb30d827f127ffd3e18c1da2b41b0438592d3f3b7397a7fe6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2205.00501","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Ian Kivlichan, Lucy Vasserman, Nitesh Goyal, Rachel Rosen","submitted_at":"2022-05-01T16:08:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning models are commonly used to detect toxicity in online conversations. These models are trained on datasets annotated by human raters. We explore how raters' self-described identities impact how they annotate toxicity in online comments. We first define the concept of specialized rater pools: rater pools formed based on raters' self-described identities, rather than at random. We formed three such rater pools for this study--specialized rater pools of raters from the U.S. who identify as African American, LGBTQ, and those who identify as neither. Each of these rater pools annota"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2205.00501","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2022-05-01T16:08:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"d926d5ad8ef5103e01a1992dc9b7119149d43b7996ea14b5fe4de5abf58e775c","abstract_canon_sha256":"abfc6e99bee45104fdeeff9b5b18ceb9803172214fe657b188d6c47bfec21ae4"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.477228Z","signature_b64":"B4I/fSxwVvSa+ULxoXM/Ok/2oz/Q7lnHiaF+zgkB7zbN2cry1RX8lZ/odFg7GRIYNCG5kPREADM+BzY17AIsDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"39591cfe0dc71efbb30d827f127ffd3e18c1da2b41b0438592d3f3b7397a7fe6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476749Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476749Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Ian Kivlichan, Lucy Vasserman, Nitesh Goyal, Rachel Rosen","submitted_at":"2022-05-01T16:08:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Machine learning models are commonly used to detect toxicity in online conversations. These models are trained on datasets annotated by human raters. We explore how raters' self-described identities impact how they annotate toxicity in online comments. We first define the concept of specialized rater pools: rater pools formed based on raters' self-described identities, rather than at random. We formed three such rater pools for this study--specialized rater pools of raters from the U.S. who identify as African American, LGBTQ, and those who identify as neither. Each of these rater pools annota"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2205.00501","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2205.00501/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2205.00501","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2205.00501v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2205.00501","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HFMRZ7QNY4PP","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYN","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HFMRZ7QN","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21043","citing_title":"Reducing the rate of personal insults in social media with bystander bots","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2305.10403","citing_title":"PaLM 2 Technical Report","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.16654","citing_title":"IYKYK (But AI Doesn't): Automated Content Moderation Does Not Capture Communities' Heterogeneous Attitudes Towards Reclaimed Language","ref_index":37,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HFMRZ7QN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HFMRZ7QN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2205.00501&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HFMRZ7QNY4PPXMYNQJ7RE775HY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:19:13.476804+00:00"}