{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK","short_pith_number":"pith:HJXG4CCF","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3a6e6e0845ca257fca14bf71ff56eb42ac0bb0ee90833f5b8a4687c6f26b52f3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.00138","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Diyi Yang, Tianshi Li, Weiyan Shi, Yanchen Liu, Yijia Shao","submitted_at":"2024-08-29T17:58:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"As language models (LMs) are widely utilized in personalized communication scenarios (e.g., sending emails, writing social media posts) and endowed with a certain level of agency, ensuring they act in accordance with the contextual privacy norms becomes increasingly critical. However, quantifying the privacy norm awareness of LMs and the emerging privacy risk in LM-mediated communication is challenging due to (1) the contextual and long-tailed nature of privacy-sensitive cases, and (2) the lack of evaluation approaches that capture realistic application scenarios. To address these challenges, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.00138","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-08-29T17:58:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"title_canon_sha256":"8315e92d290c7bbf0f4313db717caea8bea0e01450911e115b3d4cef4f7ad3e3","abstract_canon_sha256":"9e0a45cba428b40e1e6d69e88d4d1a965e89172b22ade10e227af2fa92f96c48"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.142639Z","signature_b64":"rvzw0pCdk29xfjC6HPb/y9ChxWzuo7s9uHsO4CNQIM16hYNO/DDtDyiA201UlzINVlTaiGlQRzQm9p/jiT1PCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3a6e6e0845ca257fca14bf71ff56eb42ac0bb0ee90833f5b8a4687c6f26b52f3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141638Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141638Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"PrivacyLens: Evaluating Privacy Norm Awareness of Language Models in Action","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Diyi Yang, Tianshi Li, Weiyan Shi, Yanchen Liu, Yijia Shao","submitted_at":"2024-08-29T17:58:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"As language models (LMs) are widely utilized in personalized communication scenarios (e.g., sending emails, writing social media posts) and endowed with a certain level of agency, ensuring they act in accordance with the contextual privacy norms becomes increasingly critical. However, quantifying the privacy norm awareness of LMs and the emerging privacy risk in LM-mediated communication is challenging due to (1) the contextual and long-tailed nature of privacy-sensitive cases, and (2) the lack of evaluation approaches that capture realistic application scenarios. To address these challenges, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.00138","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.00138/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.00138","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.00138v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.00138","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HJXG4CCFZISX","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HJXG4CCFZISX7SQU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HJXG4CCF","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26627","citing_title":"Agents That Know Too Much: A Data-Centric Survey of Privacy in LLM Agents","ref_index":100,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07805","citing_title":"Beyond Goodhart's Law: A Dynamic Benchmark for Evaluating Compliance in Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":63,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09823","citing_title":"CalBench: Evaluating Coordination-Privacy Trade-offs in Multi-Agent LLMs","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.30383","citing_title":"Whose Side Is Your Agent On? Multi-Party Principal Loyalty in LLM Agents","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.20368","citing_title":"Security Document Classification with a Fine-Tuned Local Large Language Model: Benchmark Data and an Open-Source System","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.14470","citing_title":"Agent-SafetyBench: Evaluating the Safety of LLM Agents","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HJXG4CCF"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HJXG4CCF","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.00138&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HJXG4CCFZISX7SQUX5Y76VXLIK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:30:56.141723+00:00"}