{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL","short_pith_number":"pith:HKF6OUET","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3a8be750933c20d8732922a97f705482d9ce09b1bee715115c9ff85407b4cad8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2205.13935","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Detecting hidden confounding in observational data using multiple environments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jesse H. Krijthe, Rickard K.A. Karlsson","submitted_at":"2022-05-27T12:20:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common assumption in causal inference from observational data is that there is no hidden confounding. Yet it is, in general, impossible to verify this assumption from a single dataset. Under the assumption of independent causal mechanisms underlying the data-generating process, we demonstrate a way to detect unobserved confounders when having multiple observational datasets coming from different environments. We present a theory for testable conditional independencies that are only absent when there is hidden confounding and examine cases where we violate its assumptions: degenerate & depend"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2205.13935","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2022-05-27T12:20:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"a36cbdff2752becb1af40a25f14c18304685891b2ce52182dc3651879aefa236","abstract_canon_sha256":"4b3805531c5d88096d329c804a50b68eb87213e83addc1498b699cc8b46bbbb7"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.133414Z","signature_b64":"ZF/wqqFWNo3bXK7qm+9R7hjYKcfmT82sqD2OqbaYfobVMmIuJijNnDc2tRvlprlY7/veZngQjjh5XnTgq6j6DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3a8be750933c20d8732922a97f705482d9ce09b1bee715115c9ff85407b4cad8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132898Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132898Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Detecting hidden confounding in observational data using multiple environments","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Jesse H. Krijthe, Rickard K.A. Karlsson","submitted_at":"2022-05-27T12:20:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"A common assumption in causal inference from observational data is that there is no hidden confounding. Yet it is, in general, impossible to verify this assumption from a single dataset. Under the assumption of independent causal mechanisms underlying the data-generating process, we demonstrate a way to detect unobserved confounders when having multiple observational datasets coming from different environments. We present a theory for testable conditional independencies that are only absent when there is hidden confounding and examine cases where we violate its assumptions: degenerate & depend"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2205.13935","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2205.13935/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2205.13935","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2205.13935v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2205.13935","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HKF6OUETHQQN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HKF6OUET","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01214","citing_title":"Markovianity-Based Conditioning Depth Diagnostics for Hidden Confounding in Observational Datasets","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HKF6OUET"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HKF6OUET","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2205.13935&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HKF6OUETHQQNQ4ZJEKUX64CUQL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:08:52.132952+00:00"}