{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K","short_pith_number":"pith:HLIPOVJZ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3ad0f755393d18afc8422e89e59c29dab64769d6e253f37eb2d9a13bcb775ed3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2009.07661","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Adoption of Twitter's New Length Limit: Is 280 the New 140?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Ashton Anderson, Kristina Gligori\\'c, Robert West","submitted_at":"2020-09-16T13:01:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"In November 2017, Twitter doubled the maximum allowed tweet length from 140 to 280 characters, a drastic switch on one of the world's most influential social media platforms. In the first long-term study of how the new length limit was adopted by Twitter users, we ask: Does the effect of the new length limit resemble that of the old one? Or did the doubling of the limit fundamentally change how Twitter is shaped by the limited length of posted content? By analyzing Twitter's publicly available 1% sample over a period of around 3 years, we find that, when the length limit was raised from 140 to"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2009.07661","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SI","submitted_at":"2020-09-16T13:01:05Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"ba815fd7e1cce8ae1a7cf7b7006c168acde02ab232508d0ca1415f6b838e8e68","abstract_canon_sha256":"1002baf0b08f06caf687b692b76916247038b6c4de488cbf41de1d9cee1c3791"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.896270Z","signature_b64":"e0E6+k/WPHn43woHXJ5G2z4m6qmS/klLCJZSeXowrvRfuRaanuttPboqpqsyJn5A1Gi6rRaN8jtukYe7bhZHBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3ad0f755393d18afc8422e89e59c29dab64769d6e253f37eb2d9a13bcb775ed3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895925Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895925Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Adoption of Twitter's New Length Limit: Is 280 the New 140?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.SI","authors_text":"Ashton Anderson, Kristina Gligori\\'c, Robert West","submitted_at":"2020-09-16T13:01:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"In November 2017, Twitter doubled the maximum allowed tweet length from 140 to 280 characters, a drastic switch on one of the world's most influential social media platforms. In the first long-term study of how the new length limit was adopted by Twitter users, we ask: Does the effect of the new length limit resemble that of the old one? Or did the doubling of the limit fundamentally change how Twitter is shaped by the limited length of posted content? By analyzing Twitter's publicly available 1% sample over a period of around 3 years, we find that, when the length limit was raised from 140 to"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2009.07661","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2009.07661/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2009.07661","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2009.07661v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2009.07661","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HLIPOVJZHUMK","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCC","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HLIPOVJZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HLIPOVJZ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HLIPOVJZ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2009.07661&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HLIPOVJZHUMK7SCCF2E6LHBJ3K/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:35:54.895985+00:00"}