{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A","short_pith_number":"pith:HLONEIYA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3adcd22300c28c77080eaa42e60f0ff0353ce1947ab927c2b1d9d6b9fe5b0a24","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.02618","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from evolutionary Game Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Baptiste Alloui-Cros, Kenneth Payne","submitted_at":"2025-07-03T13:45:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Are Large Language Models (LLMs) a new form of strategic intelligence, able to reason about goals in competitive settings? We present compelling supporting evidence. The Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) has long served as a model for studying decision-making. We conduct the first ever series of evolutionary IPD tournaments, pitting canonical strategies (e.g., Tit-for-Tat, Grim Trigger) against agents from the leading frontier AI companies OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. By varying the termination probability in each tournament (the \"shadow of the future\"), we introduce complexity and chance, c"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.02618","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-07-03T13:45:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL","cs.GT"],"title_canon_sha256":"c72127939c6e2fbb531a8d4720cf05141b0adfe9cb769b0771996102489c697b","abstract_canon_sha256":"4bc84926e77fc87d620b4ca99d0124452b3cf92c61b181a3e9dd0536167eaa64"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750998Z","signature_b64":"q1bddl3p2drjOLm9z/O7OMx6Iog+z/t4H6Ng/1oHSKXzDfIZWHo2UQjad0tePUSW6X2Dk1VXC0Gi3lOFGuudDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3adcd22300c28c77080eaa42e60f0ff0353ce1947ab927c2b1d9d6b9fe5b0a24","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750497Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750497Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Strategic Intelligence in Large Language Models: Evidence from evolutionary Game Theory","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL","cs.GT"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Baptiste Alloui-Cros, Kenneth Payne","submitted_at":"2025-07-03T13:45:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"Are Large Language Models (LLMs) a new form of strategic intelligence, able to reason about goals in competitive settings? We present compelling supporting evidence. The Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma (IPD) has long served as a model for studying decision-making. We conduct the first ever series of evolutionary IPD tournaments, pitting canonical strategies (e.g., Tit-for-Tat, Grim Trigger) against agents from the leading frontier AI companies OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. By varying the termination probability in each tournament (the \"shadow of the future\"), we introduce complexity and chance, c"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.02618","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.02618/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.02618","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.02618v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.02618","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HLONEIYAYKGH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HLONEIYAYKGHOCAO","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HLONEIYA","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28456","citing_title":"Is Lying an Emergent Behaviour in LLMs? Evidence from Gaslighting AI agents in a Sustainability Game","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.29874","citing_title":"Evolutionary Dynamics of Cooperation in Next-Generation LLM Agent Systems: A Cross-Provider Empirical Extension","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06688","citing_title":"Diagon: A Programmable Testbed for AI-Agent Cognitive Labor Markets","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HLONEIYA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HLONEIYA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.02618&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HLONEIYAYKGHOCAOVJBOMDYP6A/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:31:31.750558+00:00"}