{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G","short_pith_number":"pith:HQ2QXK4D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3c350bab8324534cfeca891d416505e99ae1333ca3f38b6a6dd50a9d68c616e3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2104.06839","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Uncertainty measures: The big picture","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","math.PR","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Fabio Cuzzolin","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T13:11:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Probability theory is far from being the most general mathematical theory of uncertainty. A number of arguments point at its inability to describe second-order ('Knightian') uncertainty. In response, a wide array of theories of uncertainty have been proposed, many of them generalisations of classical probability. As we show here, such frameworks can be organised into clusters sharing a common rationale, exhibit complex links, and are characterised by different levels of generality. Our goal is a critical appraisal of the current landscape in uncertainty theory."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2104.06839","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T13:11:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","math.PR","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"fa52c774b4216c43a9b0ad82d09b61bf427c0bf208a446ed4f3cfb4038fba3a4","abstract_canon_sha256":"b70ff7eb9daaf2f50b31afa3f1d99af2addc81072d66b12019347f7da222105a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958472Z","signature_b64":"ktgwgNbhuq7yEB+e39Lc7gXc0tpMPFnKlcDxvo0eGexR7njzQDn2YWtrAlwxQa0jDUrLKyaLp5VGf0azPS/ABw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3c350bab8324534cfeca891d416505e99ae1333ca3f38b6a6dd50a9d68c616e3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958064Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958064Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Uncertainty measures: The big picture","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","math.PR","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Fabio Cuzzolin","submitted_at":"2021-04-14T13:11:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Probability theory is far from being the most general mathematical theory of uncertainty. A number of arguments point at its inability to describe second-order ('Knightian') uncertainty. In response, a wide array of theories of uncertainty have been proposed, many of them generalisations of classical probability. As we show here, such frameworks can be organised into clusters sharing a common rationale, exhibit complex links, and are characterised by different levels of generality. Our goal is a critical appraisal of the current landscape in uncertainty theory."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2104.06839","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2104.06839/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2104.06839","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2104.06839v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2104.06839","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HQ2QXK4DERJU","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WK","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HQ2QXK4D","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07908","citing_title":"Statistical inference with belief functions: A survey","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HQ2QXK4D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HQ2QXK4D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2104.06839&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HQ2QXK4DERJUZ7WKREOUCZIF5G/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:32:09.958121+00:00"}