{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK","short_pith_number":"pith:HQYW7CTE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3c316f8a640c42b967608c6ac8094ea2bacab218620501aa235c906373dd5ace","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2509.00761","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent System with Agentic Search and Citation-Faithfulness Audit","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Boqin Yuan, Ziqi Wang","submitted_at":"2025-08-31T09:23:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models are increasingly deployed for legal question answering, where evaluations typically focus on multiple-choice accuracy. This measure overlooks a common failure: whether the citation source attached to an answer exists and supports the rule the system attributes to it. We present L-MARS, an open multi-agent legal QA system with agentic search and judge-driven evidence checks, and audit it claim by claim against its cited source. Each atomic claim is labelled with a six-class taxonomy and scored with strict-ALCE under cross-provider judging, where the answerer and verifier c"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2509.00761","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-08-31T09:23:26Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"27921217127bba8267d90f8e9a0d59e8d1a8d2d9cafb2ab743cd361ff43c3b51","abstract_canon_sha256":"0a12851966b38412c896d5b2e0ea0167c64b90481c04b053c7a08839ef69d051"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545840Z","signature_b64":"9+N9kEVTfb5nOIZwKunulVUhKdzRVKIg0s7Hrhr1KSDpOaLnCaQDS+ObR+s7eYrACjP27f0y9/MNz41tEQkPDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3c316f8a640c42b967608c6ac8094ea2bacab218620501aa235c906373dd5ace","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.544894Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.544894Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"L-MARS: Legal Multi-Agent System with Agentic Search and Citation-Faithfulness Audit","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Boqin Yuan, Ziqi Wang","submitted_at":"2025-08-31T09:23:26Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models are increasingly deployed for legal question answering, where evaluations typically focus on multiple-choice accuracy. This measure overlooks a common failure: whether the citation source attached to an answer exists and supports the rule the system attributes to it. We present L-MARS, an open multi-agent legal QA system with agentic search and judge-driven evidence checks, and audit it claim by claim against its cited source. Each atomic claim is labelled with a six-class taxonomy and scored with strict-ALCE under cross-provider judging, where the answerer and verifier c"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2509.00761","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2509.00761/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2509.00761","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2509.00761v4","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2509.00761","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HQYW7CTEBRBL","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3A","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HQYW7CTE","created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25447","citing_title":"The Interplay of Harness Design and Post-Training in LLM Agents","ref_index":54,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27331","citing_title":"Maat: The Agentic Legal Research Assistant for Competition Protection","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23853","citing_title":"ClawTrace: Cost-Aware Tracing for LLM Agent Skill Distillation","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HQYW7CTE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HQYW7CTE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2509.00761&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HQYW7CTEBRBLSZ3ARRVMQCKOUK/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-17T00:20:40.545337+00:00"}