{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F","short_pith_number":"pith:HRD7W4WC","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3c47fb72c2de843327f640fc6ffa3cd17fd33465e5a91bcc0f922f4c64f32d65","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1905.02575","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The set of separable states has no finite semidefinite representation except in dimension $3\\times 2$","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.OC"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Hamza Fawzi","submitted_at":"2019-05-04T20:10:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given integers n $\\geq$ m, let Sep(n,m) be the set of separable states on the Hilbert space $\\mathbb{C}^n \\otimes \\mathbb{C}^m$. It is well-known that for (n,m)=(3,2) the set of separable states has a simple description using semidefinite programming: it is given by the set of states that have a positive partial transpose. In this paper we show that for larger values of n and m the set Sep(n,m) has no semidefinite programming description of finite size. As Sep(n,m) is a semialgebraic set this provides a new counterexample to the Helton-Nie conjecture, which was recently disproved by Scheiderer"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1905.02575","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2019-05-04T20:10:49Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.OC"],"title_canon_sha256":"21cf3533268b1ee8d885759844fffc741342f4d77e2956ffb15a95a325381fcc","abstract_canon_sha256":"1abe44325f0f3fc867e0c2d8f1fa8ac6319dd7bc4707849718c8e2503c145b4c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.016114Z","signature_b64":"3EiC8hN6vaxXEIHhz8nDmzYVO57auANLeSIpeznJUFWsYcUUIkbfnMFZSPrqueMGGxNkAC3mLOfjVSmdPzlyBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3c47fb72c2de843327f640fc6ffa3cd17fd33465e5a91bcc0f922f4c64f32d65","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.015266Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.015266Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The set of separable states has no finite semidefinite representation except in dimension $3\\times 2$","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.OC"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Hamza Fawzi","submitted_at":"2019-05-04T20:10:49Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given integers n $\\geq$ m, let Sep(n,m) be the set of separable states on the Hilbert space $\\mathbb{C}^n \\otimes \\mathbb{C}^m$. It is well-known that for (n,m)=(3,2) the set of separable states has a simple description using semidefinite programming: it is given by the set of states that have a positive partial transpose. In this paper we show that for larger values of n and m the set Sep(n,m) has no semidefinite programming description of finite size. As Sep(n,m) is a semialgebraic set this provides a new counterexample to the Helton-Nie conjecture, which was recently disproved by Scheiderer"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1905.02575","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1905.02575","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.015423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1905.02575v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.015423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1905.02575","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.015423+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HRD7W4WC32CD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:18.533446+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7W","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:18.533446+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HRD7W4WC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:18.533446+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.30426","citing_title":"Detecting bipartite entanglement with PnCP maps and non-negative polynomials","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HRD7W4WC"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HRD7W4WC","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1905.02575&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HRD7W4WC32CDGJ7WID6G76R42F/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.015423+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:46:51.015423+00:00"}