{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64","short_pith_number":"pith:HRF6U3Y2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3c4bea6f1aad0dcf12dc83466c79c3f70f0c4c9c182e19d2e70c3d1e937aa8f7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2408.12060","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Evidence-backed Fact Checking using RAG and Few-Shot In-Context Learning with LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aman Chadha, Amitava Das, Parth Patwa, Pransh Patwa, Ronit Singhal","submitted_at":"2024-08-22T01:42:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given the widespread dissemination of misinformation on social media, implementing fact-checking mechanisms for online claims is essential. Manually verifying every claim is very challenging, underscoring the need for an automated fact-checking system. This paper presents our system designed to address this issue. We utilize the Averitec dataset (Schlichtkrull et al., 2023) to assess the performance of our fact-checking system. In addition to veracity prediction, our system provides supporting evidence, which is extracted from the dataset. We develop a Retrieve and Generate (RAG) pipeline to e"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2408.12060","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-08-22T01:42:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"a74b9366f60e4376b7da1bddc3bad3e410afe98ec3d53858951b2b4b8efc85f9","abstract_canon_sha256":"bfed760d05be67c1aff747faad2f6782dcd81e5075d4970bb83a368d0147bd3b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630755Z","signature_b64":"EPYsepHIS31H4IPYRQmIMyotROwqkO+eR7TXEGK11fv9jblmcla+CofY2WFrDwoxgCrWWpgMi01WW34QIWpMAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3c4bea6f1aad0dcf12dc83466c79c3f70f0c4c9c182e19d2e70c3d1e937aa8f7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630251Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630251Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Evidence-backed Fact Checking using RAG and Few-Shot In-Context Learning with LLMs","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aman Chadha, Amitava Das, Parth Patwa, Pransh Patwa, Ronit Singhal","submitted_at":"2024-08-22T01:42:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given the widespread dissemination of misinformation on social media, implementing fact-checking mechanisms for online claims is essential. Manually verifying every claim is very challenging, underscoring the need for an automated fact-checking system. This paper presents our system designed to address this issue. We utilize the Averitec dataset (Schlichtkrull et al., 2023) to assess the performance of our fact-checking system. In addition to veracity prediction, our system provides supporting evidence, which is extracted from the dataset. We develop a Retrieve and Generate (RAG) pipeline to e"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2408.12060","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2408.12060/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2408.12060","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2408.12060v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2408.12060","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HRF6U3Y2VUG4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HRF6U3Y2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11470","citing_title":"The Periodic Table of LLM Reasoning: A Structured Survey of Reasoning Paradigms, Methods, and Failure Modes","ref_index":214,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.02181","citing_title":"A Survey of Scaling in Large Language Model Reasoning","ref_index":186,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HRF6U3Y2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HRF6U3Y2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2408.12060&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HRF6U3Y2VUG46EW4QNDGY6OD64/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:16:20.630310+00:00"}