{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT","short_pith_number":"pith:HTX2ZCGK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3cefac88ca909ac9240c2bb222244554f6e570d42a38ca83210716823097d341","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2209.03940","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A no-go theorem for absolute observed events without inequalities or modal logic","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jonathan Barrett, Nick Ormrod","submitted_at":"2022-09-08T17:27:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper builds on no-go theorems to the effect that quantum theory is inconsistent with observations being absolute; that is, unique and non-relative. Unlike the existing no-go results, the one introduced here is based on a theory-independent absoluteness assumption, and there is no need to assume the validity of standard probability theory or of modal logic. The contradiction is derived by assuming that quantum theory applies in any inertial reference frame; accordingly, the result also illuminates a tension between special relativity and absoluteness."},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2209.03940","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2022-09-08T17:27:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"134b76f1d8ae59755b4aa67dec2dc997d81d834d0cdb417f927d21b43a315e68","abstract_canon_sha256":"28d852fbd40c184c0ff669cfe41af76a05451c51007592f5a74aaf62780d637c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.209164Z","signature_b64":"RD5VAnT76ogAeNN+Sy3rGa5FQM+scZ23p4SZhZJySpbDfhhTUT8EzHFkTSzbee3Y1h6wp/5/qDN05OuhHjrTBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3cefac88ca909ac9240c2bb222244554f6e570d42a38ca83210716823097d341","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208700Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208700Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A no-go theorem for absolute observed events without inequalities or modal logic","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Jonathan Barrett, Nick Ormrod","submitted_at":"2022-09-08T17:27:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper builds on no-go theorems to the effect that quantum theory is inconsistent with observations being absolute; that is, unique and non-relative. Unlike the existing no-go results, the one introduced here is based on a theory-independent absoluteness assumption, and there is no need to assume the validity of standard probability theory or of modal logic. The contradiction is derived by assuming that quantum theory applies in any inertial reference frame; accordingly, the result also illuminates a tension between special relativity and absoluteness."},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2209.03940","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2209.03940/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2209.03940","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2209.03940v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2209.03940","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HTX2ZCGKSCNM","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAM","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HTX2ZCGK","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00198","citing_title":"Wavefunctions localization, and the Wigner's Friend Paradox in a Framework of Discrete-Space Hypothesis","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01349","citing_title":"Is Quantum Mechanics Universal? EWF Experiments and Non Absoluteness of Events","ref_index":47,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2409.05491","citing_title":"A refined Frauchiger--Renner paradox based on strong contextuality","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14538","citing_title":"Are free choices absolute, when internalized in Wigner's friend?","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17839","citing_title":"What Do Black Holes Teach Us About Wigner's Friend?","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HTX2ZCGK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HTX2ZCGK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2209.03940&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HTX2ZCGKSCNMSJAMFOZCEJCFKT/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:55:47.208757+00:00"}