{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5","short_pith_number":"pith:HUXG33WM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3d2e6deecc898b37a97a6ef548b5277f56e33b612f803964f6d7c8fdd6fad63e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.18004","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Correctness is not Faithfulness in RAG Attributions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Avishek Anand, Jonas Wallat, Maarten de Rijke, Maria Heuss","submitted_at":"2024-12-23T21:57:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Retrieving relevant context is a common approach to reduce hallucinations and enhance answer reliability. Explicitly citing source documents allows users to verify generated responses and increases trust. Prior work largely evaluates citation correctness - whether cited documents support the corresponding statements. But citation correctness alone is insufficient. To establish trust in attributed answers, we must examine both citation correctness and citation faithfulness. In this work, we first disentangle the notions of citation correctness and faithfulness, which have been applied inconsist"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.18004","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-12-23T21:57:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a48dc3f187c80b0173cba21d241cdf4979f976b0bc49449743d30eb48a18363e","abstract_canon_sha256":"96e5c939443aedc4219722168571be45101e6c13773d531db86426b8dc48177d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.165040Z","signature_b64":"fN+QETW9oCf3yDQTA4C/COEGQC5yJ3m8GjJ8SXYufVBd61C3DDGN2Tvs5Sf17ifzJqGgZfT/JYXU+T8pZR72DA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3d2e6deecc898b37a97a6ef548b5277f56e33b612f803964f6d7c8fdd6fad63e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164616Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164616Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Correctness is not Faithfulness in RAG Attributions","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Avishek Anand, Jonas Wallat, Maarten de Rijke, Maria Heuss","submitted_at":"2024-12-23T21:57:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"Retrieving relevant context is a common approach to reduce hallucinations and enhance answer reliability. Explicitly citing source documents allows users to verify generated responses and increases trust. Prior work largely evaluates citation correctness - whether cited documents support the corresponding statements. But citation correctness alone is insufficient. To establish trust in attributed answers, we must examine both citation correctness and citation faithfulness. In this work, we first disentangle the notions of citation correctness and faithfulness, which have been applied inconsist"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.18004","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.18004/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.18004","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.18004v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.18004","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HUXG33WMRGFT","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HUXG33WM","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.03728","citing_title":"Re-Ranking Through an Attribution Lens for Citation Quality in Legal QA","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15109","citing_title":"Why Neighborhoods Matter: Traversal Context and Provenance in Agentic GraphRAG","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00199","citing_title":"RSAT: Structured Attribution Makes Small Language Models Faithful Table Reasoners","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HUXG33WM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HUXG33WM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.18004&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HUXG33WMRGFTPKL2N32URNJHP5/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:53:32.164673+00:00"}