{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN","short_pith_number":"pith:HV7NX3GJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3d7edbecc9f4d37ed7d8b2e8c5e7541b6149b8d785a05b44abfa07e3669cfd95","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2305.18638","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Short Answer Grading Using One-shot Prompting and Text Similarity Scoring Model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Su-Youn Yoon","submitted_at":"2023-05-29T22:05:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this study, we developed an automated short answer grading (ASAG) model that provided both analytic scores and final holistic scores. Short answer items typically consist of multiple sub-questions, and providing an analytic score and the text span relevant to each sub-question can increase the interpretability of the automated scores. Furthermore, they can be used to generate actionable feedback for students. Despite these advantages, most studies have focused on predicting only holistic scores due to the difficulty in constructing dataset with manual annotations. To address this difficulty"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2305.18638","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-05-29T22:05:29Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"ad23dc29cd584cb8b1c3c3019987e710cbf4ae69598c64093aec752e4eaadffb","abstract_canon_sha256":"3ddef63346c6d291649adf76c8876fb0e5d0a8701c6de42cac8ca6f6d40c697d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.202036Z","signature_b64":"O2yXYuDJqrQEWNU8YOFtsr2c0VffqGwHyCGiTMFqSXQeSp+pxm2kLkzXDAxoSYArHbeHOWV+UK47/WpeWU6lBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3d7edbecc9f4d37ed7d8b2e8c5e7541b6149b8d785a05b44abfa07e3669cfd95","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201635Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201635Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Short Answer Grading Using One-shot Prompting and Text Similarity Scoring Model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Su-Youn Yoon","submitted_at":"2023-05-29T22:05:29Z","abstract_excerpt":"In this study, we developed an automated short answer grading (ASAG) model that provided both analytic scores and final holistic scores. Short answer items typically consist of multiple sub-questions, and providing an analytic score and the text span relevant to each sub-question can increase the interpretability of the automated scores. Furthermore, they can be used to generate actionable feedback for students. Despite these advantages, most studies have focused on predicting only holistic scores due to the difficulty in constructing dataset with manual annotations. To address this difficulty"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2305.18638","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2305.18638/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2305.18638","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2305.18638v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2305.18638","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HV7NX3GJ6TJX","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HV7NX3GJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.04063","citing_title":"Fine-tuning for Better Few Shot Prompting: An Empirical Comparison for Short Answer Grading","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HV7NX3GJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HV7NX3GJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2305.18638&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HV7NX3GJ6TJX5V6YWLUMLZ2UDN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:15:03.201696+00:00"}