{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S","short_pith_number":"pith:HYNMFJME","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3e1ac2a5840d550467c15c4dbde864ecb4cd607b952335d002704e4255e4e2c5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.19550","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Which Portfolios? The Construction Dependence of Factor Model Performance","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.PR"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","authors_text":"Useong Shin","submitted_at":"2026-06-17T19:45:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Factor-model performance depends not only on the model but also on how test assets are constructed. We form characteristic-unsorted random portfolios from a broad CRSP universe and vary stock selection, initial weighting, holding, and rebalancing. Rankings shift materially: buy-and-hold favors FF5 and FF6, whereas daily constant-weighting favors FF3, the most stable model across designs. Although q5 attains the highest maximum Sharpe ratio in factor-spanning tests, it leaves comparatively large and construction-sensitive pricing errors on random portfolios. These results reflect construction-s"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.19550","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","submitted_at":"2026-06-17T19:45:36Z","cross_cats_sorted":["q-fin.PR"],"title_canon_sha256":"1c891aa3e7681e79b2684b4374d14c648580dfafbc15358b339670726c6d395e","abstract_canon_sha256":"d1e99b59eef3c726c418be2847783f7d65b0f241a1bcd7ece65f4652b4dad538"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719768Z","signature_b64":"QaffJexpMStJsABO7lOHy4fhZsCUOYhj4DWhvPdwbNdV5GP4Rd2rf9TBzR3lCJEJxfQ7yoG4juTNOEycibdXBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3e1ac2a5840d550467c15c4dbde864ecb4cd607b952335d002704e4255e4e2c5","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719418Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719418Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Which Portfolios? The Construction Dependence of Factor Model Performance","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["q-fin.PR"],"primary_cat":"q-fin.GN","authors_text":"Useong Shin","submitted_at":"2026-06-17T19:45:36Z","abstract_excerpt":"Factor-model performance depends not only on the model but also on how test assets are constructed. We form characteristic-unsorted random portfolios from a broad CRSP universe and vary stock selection, initial weighting, holding, and rebalancing. Rankings shift materially: buy-and-hold favors FF5 and FF6, whereas daily constant-weighting favors FF3, the most stable model across designs. Although q5 attains the highest maximum Sharpe ratio in factor-spanning tests, it leaves comparatively large and construction-sensitive pricing errors on random portfolios. These results reflect construction-s"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.19550","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.19550/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.19550","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.19550v1","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.19550","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HYNMFJMEBVKQ","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6B","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HYNMFJME","created_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23596","citing_title":"Anatomy of the Market: A Body-Tail Test of Factor Models","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23596","citing_title":"Anatomy of the Market: A Body-Tail Test of Factor Models","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HYNMFJME"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HYNMFJME","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.19550&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HYNMFJMEBVKQIZ6BLRG332DE5S/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-19T16:12:28.719474+00:00"}