{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY","short_pith_number":"pith:HZB2IU7M","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"3e43a453ec5ec31df78b10424a7447961f5bbcaee26e8b00723621cb2964166d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1902.00885","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon $g-2$ with 2+1 flavor lattice QCD on a larger than (10 fm$)^4$ lattice at the physical point","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Eigo Shintani, Yoshinobu Kuramashi","submitted_at":"2019-02-03T12:12:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study systematic uncertainties in the lattice QCD computation of hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution to the muon $g-2$. We investigate three systematic effects; finite volume (FV) effect, cutoff effect, and integration scheme dependence. We evaluate the FV effect at the physical pion mass on two different volumes of (5.4 fm$)^4$ and (10.8 fm$)^4$ using the PACS10 configurations at the same cutoff scale. For the cutoff effect, we compare two types of lattice vector operators, which are local and conserved (point-splitting) currents, by varying the cutoff scale on a larger than (1"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1902.00885","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-lat","submitted_at":"2019-02-03T12:12:14Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex","hep-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"c2108cf0ad0b731ebc30c7229757c28524372c91f0c3b80b2ffd335e4356e892","abstract_canon_sha256":"c0b4b898c91cea1f4da41095a664db8bebd0ed19abf8b9681bce0716cf64a935"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.212045Z","signature_b64":"PVSJBZ7sgKUF8kXtl7LSLz3/edymtnCAHRCSm2MpDJqNu9Hu2C5z2XLFndZtJ90zBTeBE1GslDqvAE35WKG6Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"3e43a453ec5ec31df78b10424a7447961f5bbcaee26e8b00723621cb2964166d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211630Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211630Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Hadronic vacuum polarization contribution to the muon $g-2$ with 2+1 flavor lattice QCD on a larger than (10 fm$)^4$ lattice at the physical point","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex","hep-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-lat","authors_text":"Eigo Shintani, Yoshinobu Kuramashi","submitted_at":"2019-02-03T12:12:14Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study systematic uncertainties in the lattice QCD computation of hadronic vacuum polarization (HVP) contribution to the muon $g-2$. We investigate three systematic effects; finite volume (FV) effect, cutoff effect, and integration scheme dependence. We evaluate the FV effect at the physical pion mass on two different volumes of (5.4 fm$)^4$ and (10.8 fm$)^4$ using the PACS10 configurations at the same cutoff scale. For the cutoff effect, we compare two types of lattice vector operators, which are local and conserved (point-splitting) currents, by varying the cutoff scale on a larger than (1"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1902.00885","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1902.00885/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1902.00885","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1902.00885v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1902.00885","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"HZB2IU7ML3BR","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"HZB2IU7ML3BR354L","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"HZB2IU7M","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2006.04822","citing_title":"The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12205","citing_title":"Comparison of the hadronic vacuum polarization between hadronic $\\tau$-decay data and lattice QCD","ref_index":67,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HZB2IU7M"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/HZB2IU7M","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1902.00885&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/HZB2IU7ML3BR354LCBBEU5CHSY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:01:40.211686+00:00"}