{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB","short_pith_number":"pith:I2ABVH5K","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"46801a9faaf3efb1efb87c6c1e5f5b70756ad9ac047bc5c13df6f8b527b6489d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.09662","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Hongyu Li, Jason Zhu","submitted_at":"2025-07-13T14:51:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large reasoning models (LRMs) like OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1 have demonstrated impressive performance on complex reasoning tasks like mathematics and programming with long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning sequences (slow-thinking), compared with traditional large language models (fast-thinking). However, these reasoning models also face a huge challenge that generating unnecessarily lengthy and redundant reasoning chains even for trivial questions. This phenomenon leads to a significant waste of inference resources, increases the response time for simple queries, and hinders the practical appl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.09662","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-07-13T14:51:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"f0959b50f8f0e4e12f1cdc29d467a80c03b9ba9555729ff3d43c806d248475fc","abstract_canon_sha256":"860b5e1b45cda974351e5bdc6d75c940eeff7893c1a24ea81edf43f46a787f36"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.566056Z","signature_b64":"fuslWjAmk64b8FqOHBmAgUDePuOXtSP+NQSskaF3CQRw0H9f7aZD/CHb0OdO4OpbLI1W//Mrn4SKlatqGazEBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"46801a9faaf3efb1efb87c6c1e5f5b70756ad9ac047bc5c13df6f8b527b6489d","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565465Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565465Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Hongyu Li, Jason Zhu","submitted_at":"2025-07-13T14:51:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large reasoning models (LRMs) like OpenAI o1 and DeepSeek R1 have demonstrated impressive performance on complex reasoning tasks like mathematics and programming with long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning sequences (slow-thinking), compared with traditional large language models (fast-thinking). However, these reasoning models also face a huge challenge that generating unnecessarily lengthy and redundant reasoning chains even for trivial questions. This phenomenon leads to a significant waste of inference resources, increases the response time for simple queries, and hinders the practical appl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.09662","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.09662/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.09662","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.09662v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.09662","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"I2ABVH5K6PX3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"I2ABVH5K6PX3D35Y","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"I2ABVH5K","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.04402","citing_title":"Not All Errors Are Equal: Consequence-Aware Reasoning Compute Allocation","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I2ABVH5K"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I2ABVH5K","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.09662&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/I2ABVH5K6PX3D35YPRWB4X23OB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:36:37.565533+00:00"}