{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP","short_pith_number":"pith:I4UU5OTX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"47294eba770de573b0ec20c09392de1be5d2f84dd21d21d3d74a89d61dae67f2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.03299","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Hulk-like GPT: Analyzing Emotional Decisions of Large Language Models in Cooperation and Bargaining Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Andrey V. Savchenko, Ilya Makarov, Maria Glushanina, Mikhail Baklashkin, Mikhail Mozikov, Nikita Severin, Valeria Bodishtianu","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T14:08:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Behavior study experiments are an important part of society modeling and understanding human interactions. In practice, many behavioral experiments encounter challenges related to internal and external validity, reproducibility, and social bias due to the complexity of social interactions and cooperation in human user studies. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have provided researchers with a new promising tool for the simulation of human behavior. However, existing LLM-based simulations operate under the unproven hypothesis that LLM agents behave similarly to humans as well as i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.03299","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T14:08:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"135a69b328bea18437283c9fa5b91d7bd45de843c13e38e06c0931f9333a26e4","abstract_canon_sha256":"99e346f8ae774e92cc61583d172846facf11bce0f07fcfd61c1b19b62eca251e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623726Z","signature_b64":"ifR+Jtm+xFu4Wpbpx0VjEeJg9RuQAK7R1XHx+Ox89c2H/SXUjMh6nilcwzKJJ6BruMmtOhAS5bnA823SW0c7BA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"47294eba770de573b0ec20c09392de1be5d2f84dd21d21d3d74a89d61dae67f2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623226Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623226Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Good, the Bad, and the Hulk-like GPT: Analyzing Emotional Decisions of Large Language Models in Cooperation and Bargaining Games","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Andrey V. Savchenko, Ilya Makarov, Maria Glushanina, Mikhail Baklashkin, Mikhail Mozikov, Nikita Severin, Valeria Bodishtianu","submitted_at":"2024-06-05T14:08:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Behavior study experiments are an important part of society modeling and understanding human interactions. In practice, many behavioral experiments encounter challenges related to internal and external validity, reproducibility, and social bias due to the complexity of social interactions and cooperation in human user studies. Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have provided researchers with a new promising tool for the simulation of human behavior. However, existing LLM-based simulations operate under the unproven hypothesis that LLM agents behave similarly to humans as well as i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.03299","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.03299/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.03299","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.03299v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.03299","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"I4UU5OTXBXSX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHM","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"I4UU5OTX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.06069","citing_title":"From Digital Distrust to Codified Honesty: Experimental Evidence on Generative AI in Credence Goods Markets","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I4UU5OTX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I4UU5OTX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.03299&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/I4UU5OTXBXSXHMHMEDAJHEW6DP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:54.623283+00:00"}