{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23","short_pith_number":"pith:I6MXVGQK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"47997a9a0a4b2099b105277f74f151d6f6fbdfe3a947ea229dfac872c26cf60a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2306.00435","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"How Many Answers Should I Give? An Empirical Study of Multi-Answer Reading Comprehension","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chen Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, Jiuheng Lin, Xiao Liu, Yansong Feng, Yuxuan Lai","submitted_at":"2023-06-01T08:22:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"The multi-answer phenomenon, where a question may have multiple answers scattered in the document, can be well handled by humans but is challenging enough for machine reading comprehension (MRC) systems. Despite recent progress in multi-answer MRC, there lacks a systematic analysis of how this phenomenon arises and how to better address it. In this work, we design a taxonomy to categorize commonly-seen multi-answer MRC instances, with which we inspect three multi-answer datasets and analyze where the multi-answer challenge comes from. We further analyze how well different paradigms of current "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2306.00435","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-06-01T08:22:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0f8a5aac068f8e913f62307b51dfa6802944533a791f9f51f0c5156447cc7a1c","abstract_canon_sha256":"9439d174d6ad729c15e73e21bcc54e4e1b2ec25aaf5f90fc958e7b5a242166b8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386971Z","signature_b64":"Agqawt4kPnWbcrayiIxjKv0loUc4J7NUAp9MwtLnOCyVJwL02MHhBfzoTdkZNWSV+D0Z3462zobLr7xW5yDLCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"47997a9a0a4b2099b105277f74f151d6f6fbdfe3a947ea229dfac872c26cf60a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.385909Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.385909Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"How Many Answers Should I Give? An Empirical Study of Multi-Answer Reading Comprehension","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chen Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, Jiuheng Lin, Xiao Liu, Yansong Feng, Yuxuan Lai","submitted_at":"2023-06-01T08:22:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"The multi-answer phenomenon, where a question may have multiple answers scattered in the document, can be well handled by humans but is challenging enough for machine reading comprehension (MRC) systems. Despite recent progress in multi-answer MRC, there lacks a systematic analysis of how this phenomenon arises and how to better address it. In this work, we design a taxonomy to categorize commonly-seen multi-answer MRC instances, with which we inspect three multi-answer datasets and analyze where the multi-answer challenge comes from. We further analyze how well different paradigms of current "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2306.00435","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2306.00435/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2306.00435","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2306.00435v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2306.00435","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"I6MXVGQKJMQJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIF","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"I6MXVGQK","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.21783","citing_title":"Evaluating List Construction and Temporal Understanding capabilities of Large Language Models","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23","json":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I6MXVGQK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/I6MXVGQK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2306.00435&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/I6MXVGQKJMQJTMIFE57XJ4KR23/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:16:26.386465+00:00"}