{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ","short_pith_number":"pith:IB2F6DGV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"40745f0cd538554425d5cdc834446c9c06a523d678e14b38966ca01a51db9b28","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1305.6339","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Universality of scholarly impact metrics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI","physics.soc-ph"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Filippo Menczer, Filippo Radicchi, Jasleen Kaur","submitted_at":"2013-05-27T22:44:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given the growing use of impact metrics in the evaluation of scholars, journals, academic institutions, and even countries, there is a critical need for means to compare scientific impact across disciplinary boundaries. Unfortunately, citation-based metrics are strongly biased by diverse field sizes and publication and citation practices. As a result, we have witnessed an explosion in the number of newly proposed metrics that claim to be \"universal.\" However, there is currently no way to objectively assess whether a normalized metric can actually compensate for disciplinary bias. We introduce "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1305.6339","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.DL","submitted_at":"2013-05-27T22:44:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.SI","physics.soc-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"ef3daa307786a38acc86de2c7c044399e10a9f58f23ab599b926487cd6865948","abstract_canon_sha256":"f0c087c7428cfc79bc08b888d3288ade1ac7d4fd7ad88629301781f0069aa10f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616707Z","signature_b64":"HUwr9AokOAHSWus8Aw6gClTN1+KCFUFUFkTQocXkfFGsroHmwOCjCYvy75z1Nel1oCi43DW5DgBItP46ajD2Dg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"40745f0cd538554425d5cdc834446c9c06a523d678e14b38966ca01a51db9b28","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616144Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616144Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Universality of scholarly impact metrics","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.SI","physics.soc-ph"],"primary_cat":"cs.DL","authors_text":"Filippo Menczer, Filippo Radicchi, Jasleen Kaur","submitted_at":"2013-05-27T22:44:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"Given the growing use of impact metrics in the evaluation of scholars, journals, academic institutions, and even countries, there is a critical need for means to compare scientific impact across disciplinary boundaries. Unfortunately, citation-based metrics are strongly biased by diverse field sizes and publication and citation practices. As a result, we have witnessed an explosion in the number of newly proposed metrics that claim to be \"universal.\" However, there is currently no way to objectively assess whether a normalized metric can actually compensate for disciplinary bias. We introduce "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1305.6339","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1305.6339","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1305.6339v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1305.6339","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616232+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IB2F6DGVHBKU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:46.883200+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:46.883200+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IB2F6DGV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:46.883200+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IB2F6DGV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IB2F6DGV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1305.6339&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IB2F6DGVHBKUIJOVZXEDIRDMTQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616232+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:09:33.616232+00:00"}