{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX","short_pith_number":"pith:IDGEHSD4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"40cc43c87c40202bf68c39630d69da2de0d970611a053489796063f9db9bccf5","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.03671","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aryan Jadon, Avinash Patil","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T23:31:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have succeeded remarkably in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet their reasoning capabilities remain a fundamental challenge. While LLMs exhibit impressive fluency and factual recall, their ability to perform complex reasoning-spanning logical deduction, mathematical problem-solving, commonsense inference, and multi-step reasoning-often falls short of human expectations. This survey provides a comprehensive review of emerging techniques enhancing reasoning in LLMs. We categorize existing methods into key approaches, including prompting strategies ("},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.03671","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T23:31:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"a41d4282f9cc48152a67f09d76bccd7270a8c870b8e5f6cfbd2f0d4b42701235","abstract_canon_sha256":"32a34dc6a6b993b1926f7ec9415e060d308f941a2c9bb0ca7a56e529023d268f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850694Z","signature_b64":"V86t/rUJjfTJ2KyW1Q/9v+J6YQa1NdliP+Ga5LN2t+35jrlJEeAOwqaDFlnsJf3iQ1I3lp3A8Js7hn1Sck6AAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"40cc43c87c40202bf68c39630d69da2de0d970611a053489796063f9db9bccf5","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850133Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850133Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Advancing Reasoning in Large Language Models: Promising Methods and Approaches","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aryan Jadon, Avinash Patil","submitted_at":"2025-02-05T23:31:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) have succeeded remarkably in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet their reasoning capabilities remain a fundamental challenge. While LLMs exhibit impressive fluency and factual recall, their ability to perform complex reasoning-spanning logical deduction, mathematical problem-solving, commonsense inference, and multi-step reasoning-often falls short of human expectations. This survey provides a comprehensive review of emerging techniques enhancing reasoning in LLMs. We categorize existing methods into key approaches, including prompting strategies ("},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.03671","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.03671/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.03671","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.03671v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.03671","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IDGEHSD4IAQC","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IDGEHSD4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.05185","citing_title":"ClassicLogic: A Knowledge-Driven Benchmark of Classic Puzzle Games for Evaluating Compositional Generalization","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21851","citing_title":"OPPO: Bayesian Value Recursion for Token-Level Credit Assignment in LLM Reasoning","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21851","citing_title":"OPPO: Bayesian Value Recursion for Token-Level Credit Assignment in LLM Reasoning","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2505.01441","citing_title":"Agentic Reasoning and Tool Integration for LLMs via Reinforcement Learning","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21479","citing_title":"Frozen LLMs as Map-Aware Spatio-Temporal Reasoners for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.15725","citing_title":"Reasoning-targeted Jailbreak Attacks on Large Reasoning Models via Semantic Triggers and Psychological Framing","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IDGEHSD4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IDGEHSD4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.03671&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IDGEHSD4IAQCX5UMHFRQ22O2FX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:10:51.850194+00:00"}