{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE","short_pith_number":"pith:IGKQ2FTX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"41950d1677076585d8ea496147dbda211a95dc37cc32f36b457fc346233003a8","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.07575","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Uncertainty-o: One Model-agnostic Framework for Unveiling Uncertainty in Large Multimodal Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Hao Fei, Hu Zhang, Ruiyang Zhang, Zhedong Zheng","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T09:20:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), harnessing the complementarity among diverse modalities, are often considered more robust than pure Language Large Models (LLMs); yet do LMMs know what they do not know? There are three key open questions remaining: (1) how to evaluate the uncertainty of diverse LMMs in a unified manner, (2) how to prompt LMMs to show its uncertainty, and (3) how to quantify uncertainty for downstream tasks. In an attempt to address these challenges, we introduce Uncertainty-o: (1) a model-agnostic framework designed to reveal uncertainty in LMMs regardless of their modalities, "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.07575","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CV","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T09:20:20Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"be318144fbc51ac199ee331241b5adec0d0e547405330137f6d9e029e6374aa2","abstract_canon_sha256":"209cddb28dcc8bde14c7dd4bc09c8aa716b5b842ce6ab42406bf61c397b272ca"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.683431Z","signature_b64":"RDkjp1cpyv54FgvBI9+dWrjzqyrwHzdUCZelWuFolPz0pn3OFF224p9gMcyJiFDiajId0CGdDG2tW4G6PNuhAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"41950d1677076585d8ea496147dbda211a95dc37cc32f36b457fc346233003a8","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682941Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682941Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Uncertainty-o: One Model-agnostic Framework for Unveiling Uncertainty in Large Multimodal Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CV","authors_text":"Hao Fei, Hu Zhang, Ruiyang Zhang, Zhedong Zheng","submitted_at":"2025-06-09T09:20:20Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), harnessing the complementarity among diverse modalities, are often considered more robust than pure Language Large Models (LLMs); yet do LMMs know what they do not know? There are three key open questions remaining: (1) how to evaluate the uncertainty of diverse LMMs in a unified manner, (2) how to prompt LMMs to show its uncertainty, and (3) how to quantify uncertainty for downstream tasks. In an attempt to address these challenges, we introduce Uncertainty-o: (1) a model-agnostic framework designed to reveal uncertainty in LMMs regardless of their modalities, "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.07575","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.07575/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.07575","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.07575v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.07575","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IGKQ2FTXA5SY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHK","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IGKQ2FTX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.19868","citing_title":"A Systematic Evaluation of Black-Box Uncertainty Estimation Methods for Large Language Models","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IGKQ2FTX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IGKQ2FTX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.07575&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IGKQ2FTXA5SYLWHKJFQUPW62EE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:29.682992+00:00"}