{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T","short_pith_number":"pith:IHBBPFEE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"41c2179484ee9549927d31a2b74a34fce95ac7ea3a38fbd363ceafe8976f7139","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1406.5191","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Decoding the Star-Forming Main Sequence or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Central Limit Theorem","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","authors_text":"Daniel D. Kelson (1) ((1) The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science)","submitted_at":"2014-06-19T20:00:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Star-formation rates (SFR) of disk galaxies strongly correlate with stellar mass, with a small dispersion in SSFR at fixed mass, sigma~0.3 dex. With such small scatter this star-formation main sequence (SFMS) has been interpreted as deterministic and fundamental. Here we demonstrate that it is a simple consequence of the central limit theorem. Our derivation begins by approximating in situ stellar mass growth as a stochastic process, much like a random walk (where the expectation of SFR at any time is equal to the SFR at the previous time). We then derive expectation values for median SSFR of "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1406.5191","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","submitted_at":"2014-06-19T20:00:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4bd10f27c2d060d58f4d02da99063fb032a6c02c3263925556fffc9a90c80994","abstract_canon_sha256":"c67d8e8b439cd8af73ed2adb41078d3edc8921493afbe22d86a86d0138e8048d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715832Z","signature_b64":"rgy1ZGrPYyjFXcJZFUgUviBdVwL2U+TDYxtt3ExaQZRvwCKd/wkFEpyuY37WyGH2NUHRcUOUj6RVu9J8acANAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"41c2179484ee9549927d31a2b74a34fce95ac7ea3a38fbd363ceafe8976f7139","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715136Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715136Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Decoding the Star-Forming Main Sequence or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Central Limit Theorem","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.GA","authors_text":"Daniel D. Kelson (1) ((1) The Observatories of the Carnegie Institution for Science)","submitted_at":"2014-06-19T20:00:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Star-formation rates (SFR) of disk galaxies strongly correlate with stellar mass, with a small dispersion in SSFR at fixed mass, sigma~0.3 dex. With such small scatter this star-formation main sequence (SFMS) has been interpreted as deterministic and fundamental. Here we demonstrate that it is a simple consequence of the central limit theorem. Our derivation begins by approximating in situ stellar mass growth as a stochastic process, much like a random walk (where the expectation of SFR at any time is equal to the SFR at the previous time). We then derive expectation values for median SSFR of "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1406.5191","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1406.5191","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715238+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1406.5191v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715238+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1406.5191","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715238+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IHBBPFEE52KU","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:33.132498+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IHBBPFEE52KUTET5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:33.132498+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IHBBPFEE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:33.132498+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2508.21152","citing_title":"How does feedback affect the star formation histories of galaxies?","ref_index":86,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IHBBPFEE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IHBBPFEE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1406.5191&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IHBBPFEE52KUTET5GGRLOSRU7T/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715238+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:49:19.715238+00:00"}