{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY","short_pith_number":"pith:IJF42VMH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"424bcd5587541068f05e68e2400bf0ce32559807304266e56699a1e0f612a3ad","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.06781","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"A Survey of Four Precessing Waveform Models for Binary Black Hole Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Jake Mac Uilliam, Jonathan E. Thompson, Sarp Akcay","submitted_at":"2024-02-09T21:01:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Angular momentum and spin precession are expected to be generic features of a significant fraction of binary black hole systems. As such, it is essential to have waveform models that faithfully incorporate the effects of precession. Here, we assess how well the current state of the art models achieve this for waveform strains constructed only from the $\\ell=2$ multipoles.Specifically, we conduct a survey on the faithfulness of the waveform models %(approximants) \\texttt{SEOBNRv5PHM}, \\texttt{TEOBResumS}, \\texttt{IMRPhenomTPHM}, \\texttt{IMRPhenomXPHM} to the numerical relativity (NR) surrogate "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.06781","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2024-02-09T21:01:01Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.IM"],"title_canon_sha256":"9406a3461255817320cdf3335437e7ef66bc4534b2759a131fcba38dd2aad7b8","abstract_canon_sha256":"fd7bd761817c91e3ffab0639e7ae0599cf4dddbfa5edd098daa5ceadf9b56090"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.440185Z","signature_b64":"fFbLAYlMKcX8w0NGrBcL1fgsmLEAyV/+74/1yiIEXH8FePKN855BgSozv42RnaD3kEz4MmjX1NK8cBIe6xVtCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"424bcd5587541068f05e68e2400bf0ce32559807304266e56699a1e0f612a3ad","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439831Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439831Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"A Survey of Four Precessing Waveform Models for Binary Black Hole Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Jake Mac Uilliam, Jonathan E. Thompson, Sarp Akcay","submitted_at":"2024-02-09T21:01:01Z","abstract_excerpt":"Angular momentum and spin precession are expected to be generic features of a significant fraction of binary black hole systems. As such, it is essential to have waveform models that faithfully incorporate the effects of precession. Here, we assess how well the current state of the art models achieve this for waveform strains constructed only from the $\\ell=2$ multipoles.Specifically, we conduct a survey on the faithfulness of the waveform models %(approximants) \\texttt{SEOBNRv5PHM}, \\texttt{TEOBResumS}, \\texttt{IMRPhenomTPHM}, \\texttt{IMRPhenomXPHM} to the numerical relativity (NR) surrogate "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.06781","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.06781/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.06781","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.06781v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.06781","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IJF42VMHKQIG","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IJF42VMH","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.16113","citing_title":"Post-adiabatic self-force waveforms: slowly spinning primary and precessing secondary","ref_index":160,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.07388","citing_title":"GW190711_030756 and GW200114_020818: astrophysical interpretation of two asymmetric binary black hole mergers in the IAS catalog","ref_index":70,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.04546","citing_title":"Recoil kicks from binary black hole mergers in GWTC catalogs: implications for retention and hierarchical mergers","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IJF42VMH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IJF42VMH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.06781&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IJF42VMHKQIGR4C6NDREAC7QZY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:43:38.439888+00:00"}