{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV","short_pith_number":"pith:IKORDNDE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"429d11b4646a1e2746723db894bead1d755033ff503b77103256a4ad232847c2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.04835","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Do Code LLMs Understand Design Patterns?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Binhua Li, Han Liu, Rongyu Cao, Xuefeng Song, Yongbin Li, Yunkun Wang, Zhenyu Pan","submitted_at":"2025-01-08T20:39:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Code Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate great versatility in adapting to various downstream tasks, including code generation and completion, as well as bug detection and fixing. However, Code LLMs often fail to capture existing coding standards, leading to the generation of code that conflicts with the required design patterns for a given project. As a result, developers must post-process to adapt the generated code to the project's design norms. In this work, we empirically investigate the biases of Code LLMs in software development. Through carefully designed experiments, we assess the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.04835","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-01-08T20:39:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"0df7d423f5cd10df7ee8db140c5806c08a7a8ca8626f4a7fa3d2e5c71aae8bb1","abstract_canon_sha256":"c729fe33ec1e183e73189ebf7268ecc16ff8a39931d73564ca86713e9342488d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988795Z","signature_b64":"JJ+DDa9Vc7gzMK+GR1z0ylEhsLWBIxWEw7H+ZqjfXoviedIq3pcJSiNR+CuGpFFQ8JaI3vnInReEfZ1hbHKgAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"429d11b4646a1e2746723db894bead1d755033ff503b77103256a4ad232847c2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988355Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988355Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Do Code LLMs Understand Design Patterns?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Binhua Li, Han Liu, Rongyu Cao, Xuefeng Song, Yongbin Li, Yunkun Wang, Zhenyu Pan","submitted_at":"2025-01-08T20:39:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Code Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate great versatility in adapting to various downstream tasks, including code generation and completion, as well as bug detection and fixing. However, Code LLMs often fail to capture existing coding standards, leading to the generation of code that conflicts with the required design patterns for a given project. As a result, developers must post-process to adapt the generated code to the project's design norms. In this work, we empirically investigate the biases of Code LLMs in software development. Through carefully designed experiments, we assess the"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.04835","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.04835/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.04835","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.04835v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.04835","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IKORDNDENIPC","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IKORDNDENIPCORTS","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IKORDNDE","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.13955","citing_title":"Towards Personalizing Secure Programming Education with LLM-Injected Vulnerabilities","ref_index":21,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IKORDNDE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IKORDNDE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.04835&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IKORDNDENIPCORTSHW4JJPVNDV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:58:46.988429+00:00"}