{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6","short_pith_number":"pith:IL62PJCT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"42fda7a4530aaaa50cd951c51e43f13f8a8aa5daf3643e1736c822c2ecb7c554","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2410.20007","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Cooperative Strategic Planning Enhances Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Danqing Wang, Fei Fang, Lei Li, Zhuorui Ye","submitted_at":"2024-10-25T23:32:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is crucial for enabling them to tackle complex, multi-step problems. Multi-agent frameworks have shown great potential in enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities. However, the lack of effective cooperation between LLM agents hinders their performance, especially for multi-step reasoning tasks. This paper proposes a novel cooperative multi-agent reasoning framework (CoPlanner) by separating reasoning steps and assigning distinct duties to different agents. CoPlanner consists of two LLM agents: a planning agent and a reasoning a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2410.20007","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-10-25T23:32:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"a9b9b79d61657a9b4b918cc83c07aa33e4db340ba17be01204367d9389705b7b","abstract_canon_sha256":"50fe92da7e34759694c5df9a7dc997754549fcade0bbf2bea0e0b1173b182fa6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.395158Z","signature_b64":"0E18HLVC82cVgrG5ktPLpA1nTrP+7rqWJyOsAgczwBiulPj9FByusYdH7WFWjX+up3fCiA02SDa1xs+hF/3RCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"42fda7a4530aaaa50cd951c51e43f13f8a8aa5daf3643e1736c822c2ecb7c554","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394644Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394644Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Cooperative Strategic Planning Enhances Reasoning Capabilities in Large Language Models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Danqing Wang, Fei Fang, Lei Li, Zhuorui Ye","submitted_at":"2024-10-25T23:32:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) is crucial for enabling them to tackle complex, multi-step problems. Multi-agent frameworks have shown great potential in enhancing LLMs' reasoning capabilities. However, the lack of effective cooperation between LLM agents hinders their performance, especially for multi-step reasoning tasks. This paper proposes a novel cooperative multi-agent reasoning framework (CoPlanner) by separating reasoning steps and assigning distinct duties to different agents. CoPlanner consists of two LLM agents: a planning agent and a reasoning a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2410.20007","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2410.20007/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2410.20007","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2410.20007v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2410.20007","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IL62PJCTBKVK","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IL62PJCT","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.01231","citing_title":"Rethinking the Illusion of Thinking","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IL62PJCT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IL62PJCT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2410.20007&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IL62PJCTBKVKKDGZKHCR4Q7RH6/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:26:37.394703+00:00"}