{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY","short_pith_number":"pith:ILND63AJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"42da3f6c093113601352ad9158fac04603e7f4a99e88cccd8bba3190386253f9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.13350","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fact-based Court Judgment Prediction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aniket Deroy, Shubham Kumar Nigam","submitted_at":"2023-11-22T12:39:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"This extended abstract extends the research presented in \"ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation\" \\cite{malik-etal-2021-ildc}, focusing on fact-based judgment prediction within the context of Indian legal documents. We introduce two distinct problem variations: one based solely on facts, and another combining facts with rulings from lower courts (RLC). Our research aims to enhance early-phase case outcome prediction, offering significant benefits to legal professionals and the general public. The results, however, indicated a performance decl"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.13350","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2023-11-22T12:39:28Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.IR","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"6be9ff19006934d630242d90d1dc79a62f869dbca13d8adc066070b3510bb3b2","abstract_canon_sha256":"763029daf507bf3ab6c1f92553f08d587f76db797cbb3fb73ff705fe61548788"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175711Z","signature_b64":"3KgghWJLDtnK6SdqtA6bomfWx2k7JEEwt59yr0JkeGqvT6N4rnLFO/8Sb7307MyGLU5M1pQeGk9xSDAfL0NACA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"42da3f6c093113601352ad9158fac04603e7f4a99e88cccd8bba3190386253f9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175193Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175193Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fact-based Court Judgment Prediction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.IR","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Aniket Deroy, Shubham Kumar Nigam","submitted_at":"2023-11-22T12:39:28Z","abstract_excerpt":"This extended abstract extends the research presented in \"ILDC for CJPE: Indian Legal Documents Corpus for Court Judgment Prediction and Explanation\" \\cite{malik-etal-2021-ildc}, focusing on fact-based judgment prediction within the context of Indian legal documents. We introduce two distinct problem variations: one based solely on facts, and another combining facts with rulings from lower courts (RLC). Our research aims to enhance early-phase case outcome prediction, offering significant benefits to legal professionals and the general public. The results, however, indicated a performance decl"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.13350","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.13350/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.13350","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.13350v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.13350","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ILND63AJGEJW","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ILND63AJGEJWAE2S","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ILND63AJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28044","citing_title":"A Tree-of-Thoughts Inspired Hybrid Approach for Legal Case Judgement Summarization using LLMs","ref_index":241,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ILND63AJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ILND63AJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.13350&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ILND63AJGEJWAE2SVWIVR6WAIY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:15:28.175248+00:00"}