{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB","short_pith_number":"pith:IM33R4CX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4337b8f05750f1c5b3e49f988fe2621866d92698c21aa8910df38db61e4c33f2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.05675","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Zero-Shot Event Causality Identification via Multi-source Evidence Fuzzy Aggregation with Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Qing Cheng, Weiping Ding, Wentao Li, Xingchen Hu, Zefan Zeng, Zhong Liu","submitted_at":"2025-06-06T01:56:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Event Causality Identification (ECI) aims to detect causal relationships between events in textual contexts. Existing ECI models predominantly rely on supervised methodologies, suffering from dependence on large-scale annotated data. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) enable zero-shot ECI, they are prone to causal hallucination-erroneously establishing spurious causal links. To address these challenges, we propose MEFA, a novel zero-shot framework based on Multi-source Evidence Fuzzy Aggregation. First, we decompose causality reasoning into three main tasks (temporality determination, neces"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.05675","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-06T01:56:05Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"72d64e220b8d8102a4a02f780144f28af30b370278437e9febef52427ecad970","abstract_canon_sha256":"4a79c0660b4872d61518eb67df908022aca2c99196522f5d09a9046b7e01cb28"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542795Z","signature_b64":"Awqvlc3O6e2Km8dM7axTCuPOxnjdYcL1W1OFz9hev2wgzVdaE0tOvA6KuTucBQKdAKM8VLO9FXJeG+h0X+8UDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4337b8f05750f1c5b3e49f988fe2621866d92698c21aa8910df38db61e4c33f2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542308Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542308Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Zero-Shot Event Causality Identification via Multi-source Evidence Fuzzy Aggregation with Large Language Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Qing Cheng, Weiping Ding, Wentao Li, Xingchen Hu, Zefan Zeng, Zhong Liu","submitted_at":"2025-06-06T01:56:05Z","abstract_excerpt":"Event Causality Identification (ECI) aims to detect causal relationships between events in textual contexts. Existing ECI models predominantly rely on supervised methodologies, suffering from dependence on large-scale annotated data. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) enable zero-shot ECI, they are prone to causal hallucination-erroneously establishing spurious causal links. To address these challenges, we propose MEFA, a novel zero-shot framework based on Multi-source Evidence Fuzzy Aggregation. First, we decompose causality reasoning into three main tasks (temporality determination, neces"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.05675","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.05675/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.05675","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.05675v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.05675","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IM33R4CXKDY4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IM33R4CXKDY4LM7E","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IM33R4CX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23414","citing_title":"When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":101,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.12748","citing_title":"Generating Effective CoT Traces for Mitigating Causal Hallucination","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IM33R4CX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IM33R4CX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.05675&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IM33R4CXKDY4LM7ET6MI7YTCDB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:18:23.542378+00:00"}