{"bundle_type":"pith_open_graph_bundle","bundle_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY","short_pith_number":"pith:INHJO2QC","canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14097","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T20:28:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"694dc2a5dd6a60962b7ae817fc71d38d0f0ae1e103b26a3b5bbc6837e3aca914","abstract_canon_sha256":"4cb4ee6167eca055b20e1c1d195d971e4818b7b21a1fb0f9553b169b80d54e78"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"434e976a02654e581dd56a640f55848e16d6e4393c2e8510a969a724699a3b1a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.14097","version":1},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14097","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14097v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14097","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"INHJO2QCMVHF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"INHJO2QCMVHFQHOV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"INHJO2QC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"events":[{"event_type":"record_created","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY","target":"record","payload":{"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.14097","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T20:28:21Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"694dc2a5dd6a60962b7ae817fc71d38d0f0ae1e103b26a3b5bbc6837e3aca914","abstract_canon_sha256":"4cb4ee6167eca055b20e1c1d195d971e4818b7b21a1fb0f9553b169b80d54e78"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"canonical_sha256":"434e976a02654e581dd56a640f55848e16d6e4393c2e8510a969a724699a3b1a","receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12.140799Z","signature_b64":"KOxhQpPn7/fva+qJMAWECA1ejx4EHfXCDlq0JKv5LMQ30v1feKK5djjJguP5AG95vGT4TPsTZRR7dHSe7EIHDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"434e976a02654e581dd56a640f55848e16d6e4393c2e8510a969a724699a3b1a","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12.140250Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12.140250Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"source_kind":"arxiv","source_id":"2605.14097","source_version":1,"attestation_state":"computed"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"WkrdICCB2i4fM23sObP9fANn0liQCxYH7AYLT9eS8a3+Mu4cYHMFDMt9r83501nk+I9TAdUvowMiaGtKMuVnCg==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-19T01:53:56.198782Z"},"content_sha256":"0fe062a1739e4009d8b574405ad590a124fa1de84ed018c19d5662390eab86cc","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:0fe062a1739e4009d8b574405ad590a124fa1de84ed018c19d5662390eab86cc"},{"event_type":"graph_snapshot","subject_pith_number":"pith:2026:INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY","target":"graph","payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"LLM facilitators in group charity tasks shift specific donation shares by up to 5.5 points without raising overall consensus or participation equity.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Aaron Parisi, Alden Hallak, Crystal Qian, Nithum Thain, Vivian Tsai","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T20:28:21Z","abstract_excerpt":"As large language models (LLMs) evolve from single-user assistants to active participants in civic and workplace deliberation, evaluating their effects on collective decision making becomes a governance challenge. We present two empirical studies (N=879) of real-time, text-based group deliberation in an incentive-compatible charity allocation task with real financial stakes ($7,200 USD). Groups of three allocate a donation budget under varying LLM facilitation conditions: Study 1 (N=204) compares three frontier models; Study 2 (N=675) compares facilitator strategies against a no-facilitation b"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Across both studies, LLM facilitation did not significantly improve group consensus in either study, yet participants consistently preferred facilitated discussion. We additionally identify two governance-relevant risks. First, algorithmic steering: facilitators shifted select charity-level allocations by up to 5.5 percentage points -- directly affecting the final charitable payout -- even when aggregate agreement metrics remained unchanged. Second, an illusion of inclusion: participants cited inclusivity as their primary reason for preferring LLM facilitators, yet neither survey nor transcript-based measures of participation equity improved.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That the specific charity allocation task with real financial stakes and text-only chat generalizes to other group deliberation settings, and that the chosen survey and transcript metrics adequately capture steering and equity effects without missing subtle dynamics.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"LLM facilitators in real-stakes group charity decisions shift specific allocations without raising consensus or participation equity, yet increase perceived trust and preference for the process.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"LLM facilitators in group charity tasks shift specific donation shares by up to 5.5 points without raising overall consensus or participation equity.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"c3ab1014d908245896148f355a06d5f061b3032e47693fbf03dfa36a0f1a2892"},"source":{"id":"2605.14097","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"9a3278a4-7fa9-4a2d-a303-aae730300915","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T01:47:15.030741Z","strongest_claim":"Across both studies, LLM facilitation did not significantly improve group consensus in either study, yet participants consistently preferred facilitated discussion. We additionally identify two governance-relevant risks. First, algorithmic steering: facilitators shifted select charity-level allocations by up to 5.5 percentage points -- directly affecting the final charitable payout -- even when aggregate agreement metrics remained unchanged. Second, an illusion of inclusion: participants cited inclusivity as their primary reason for preferring LLM facilitators, yet neither survey nor transcript-based measures of participation equity improved.","one_line_summary":"LLM facilitators in real-stakes group charity decisions shift specific allocations without raising consensus or participation equity, yet increase perceived trust and preference for the process.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That the specific charity allocation task with real financial stakes and text-only chat generalizes to other group deliberation settings, and that the chosen survey and transcript metrics adequately capture steering and equity effects without missing subtle dynamics.","pith_extraction_headline":"LLM facilitators in group charity tasks shift specific donation shares by up to 5.5 points without raising overall consensus or participation equity."},"references":{"count":62,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"Mohammed Alsobay, David M Rothschild, Jake M Hofman, and Daniel G Goldstein. 2025. Bringing Everyone to the Table: An Experimental Study of LLM-Facilitated Group Decision Making.arXiv preprint arXiv:2","work_id":"aae37f7d-5043-4298-8d57-749d562a9553","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2022,"title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","work_id":"faaaa4e0-2676-4fac-a0b4-99aef10d2095","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"2212.08073","is_internal_anchor":true},{"doi":"10.1146/annurev-","year":2020,"title":"Communication-aware robotics: Exploiting motion for communication","work_id":"07985787-a47d-4d27-8268-b9f1278ede89","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1191/1478088706qp063oa","year":2006,"title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","work_id":"d01a0425-63de-4bf3-970b-b7b52cd79071","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"10.1145/3377325.3377498","year":2020,"title":"Gajos, and Elena L","work_id":"be712ef5-e19c-44a5-960d-1396fde7b46a","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":62,"snapshot_sha256":"3ef6664f7d61bccd35e47f3a2025b44a2060af7f3d83979cfb414a72a33e5492","internal_anchors":2},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"verdict_id":"9a3278a4-7fa9-4a2d-a303-aae730300915"},"signer":{"signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z","supersedes":[],"prev_event":null,"signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"yilYFGQVxzHMEmYGxg2fKHh9RtZ5HBjAJoXqD5g3rznSNYBT0rcwZfLKGCO1Z8Zd/0VZus7nlw5hWgN1xk/6DA==","signed_message":"open_graph_event_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-19T01:53:56.199767Z"},"content_sha256":"ddf9df1f4356e6f53e62c40cfe07f8bfe9ea0f7b00f3906de020fad1f9cb5cc7","schema_version":"1.0","event_id":"sha256:ddf9df1f4356e6f53e62c40cfe07f8bfe9ea0f7b00f3906de020fad1f9cb5cc7"}],"timestamp_proofs":[],"mirror_hints":[{"mirror_type":"https","name":"Pith Resolver","base_url":"https://pith.science","bundle_url":"https://pith.science/pith/INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY/bundle.json","state_url":"https://pith.science/pith/INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY/state.json","well_known_bundle_url":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY/bundle.json","status":"primary"}],"public_keys":[{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","format":"raw","public_key_b64":"stVStoiQhXFxp4s2pdzPNoqVNBMojDU/fJ2db5S3CbM=","public_key_hex":"b2d552b68890857171a78b36a5dccf368a953413288c353f7c9d9d6f94b709b3","fingerprint_sha256_b32_first128bits":"RVFV5Z2OI2J3ZUO7ERDEBCYNKS","fingerprint_sha256_hex":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","rotates_at":null,"url":"https://pith.science/pith-signing-key.json","notes":"Pith uses this Ed25519 key to sign canonical record SHA-256 digests. Verify with: ed25519_verify(public_key, message=canonical_sha256_bytes, signature=base64decode(signature_b64))."}],"merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","built_at":"2026-05-19T01:53:56Z","links":{"resolver":"https://pith.science/pith/INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY","bundle":"https://pith.science/pith/INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY/bundle.json","state":"https://pith.science/pith/INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY/state.json","well_known_bundle":"https://pith.science/.well-known/pith/INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY/bundle.json"},"state":{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2026:INHJO2QCMVHFQHOVNJSA6VMERY","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"4cb4ee6167eca055b20e1c1d195d971e4818b7b21a1fb0f9553b169b80d54e78","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T20:28:21Z","title_canon_sha256":"694dc2a5dd6a60962b7ae817fc71d38d0f0ae1e103b26a3b5bbc6837e3aca914"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.14097","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.14097","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.14097v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2605.14097","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"INHJO2QCMVHF","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"INHJO2QCMVHFQHOV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"INHJO2QC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:ddf9df1f4356e6f53e62c40cfe07f8bfe9ea0f7b00f3906de020fad1f9cb5cc7","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Across both studies, LLM facilitation did not significantly improve group consensus in either study, yet participants consistently preferred facilitated discussion. We additionally identify two governance-relevant risks. First, algorithmic steering: facilitators shifted select charity-level allocations by up to 5.5 percentage points -- directly affecting the final charitable payout -- even when aggregate agreement metrics remained unchanged. Second, an illusion of inclusion: participants cited inclusivity as their primary reason for preferring LLM facilitators, yet neither survey nor transcript-based measures of participation equity improved."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"That the specific charity allocation task with real financial stakes and text-only chat generalizes to other group deliberation settings, and that the chosen survey and transcript metrics adequately capture steering and equity effects without missing subtle dynamics."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"LLM facilitators in real-stakes group charity decisions shift specific allocations without raising consensus or participation equity, yet increase perceived trust and preference for the process."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"LLM facilitators in group charity tasks shift specific donation shares by up to 5.5 points without raising overall consensus or participation equity."}],"snapshot_sha256":"c3ab1014d908245896148f355a06d5f061b3032e47693fbf03dfa36a0f1a2892"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"As large language models (LLMs) evolve from single-user assistants to active participants in civic and workplace deliberation, evaluating their effects on collective decision making becomes a governance challenge. We present two empirical studies (N=879) of real-time, text-based group deliberation in an incentive-compatible charity allocation task with real financial stakes ($7,200 USD). Groups of three allocate a donation budget under varying LLM facilitation conditions: Study 1 (N=204) compares three frontier models; Study 2 (N=675) compares facilitator strategies against a no-facilitation b","authors_text":"Aaron Parisi, Alden Hallak, Crystal Qian, Nithum Thain, Vivian Tsai","cross_cats":[],"headline":"LLM facilitators in group charity tasks shift specific donation shares by up to 5.5 points without raising overall consensus or participation equity.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T20:28:21Z","title":"Real-Time Group Dynamics with LLM Facilitation: Evidence from a Charity Allocation Task"},"references":{"count":62,"internal_anchors":2,"resolved_work":62,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Mohammed Alsobay, David M Rothschild, Jake M Hofman, and Daniel G Goldstein. 2025. Bringing Everyone to the Table: An Experimental Study of LLM-Facilitated Group Decision Making.arXiv preprint arXiv:2","work_id":"aae37f7d-5043-4298-8d57-749d562a9553","year":2025},{"cited_arxiv_id":"2212.08073","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":true,"ref_index":2,"title":"Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedback","work_id":"faaaa4e0-2676-4fac-a0b4-99aef10d2095","year":2022},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1146/annurev-","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Communication-aware robotics: Exploiting motion for communication","work_id":"07985787-a47d-4d27-8268-b9f1278ede89","year":2020},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1191/1478088706qp063oa","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":4,"title":"Using thematic analysis in psychology","work_id":"d01a0425-63de-4bf3-970b-b7b52cd79071","year":2006},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"10.1145/3377325.3377498","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":5,"title":"Gajos, and Elena L","work_id":"be712ef5-e19c-44a5-960d-1396fde7b46a","year":2020}],"snapshot_sha256":"3ef6664f7d61bccd35e47f3a2025b44a2060af7f3d83979cfb414a72a33e5492"},"source":{"id":"2605.14097","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-15T01:47:15.030741Z","id":"9a3278a4-7fa9-4a2d-a303-aae730300915","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"LLM facilitators in real-stakes group charity decisions shift specific allocations without raising consensus or participation equity, yet increase perceived trust and preference for the process.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"LLM facilitators in group charity tasks shift specific donation shares by up to 5.5 points without raising overall consensus or participation equity.","strongest_claim":"Across both studies, LLM facilitation did not significantly improve group consensus in either study, yet participants consistently preferred facilitated discussion. We additionally identify two governance-relevant risks. First, algorithmic steering: facilitators shifted select charity-level allocations by up to 5.5 percentage points -- directly affecting the final charitable payout -- even when aggregate agreement metrics remained unchanged. Second, an illusion of inclusion: participants cited inclusivity as their primary reason for preferring LLM facilitators, yet neither survey nor transcript-based measures of participation equity improved.","weakest_assumption":"That the specific charity allocation task with real financial stakes and text-only chat generalizes to other group deliberation settings, and that the chosen survey and transcript metrics adequately capture steering and equity effects without missing subtle dynamics."}},"verdict_id":"9a3278a4-7fa9-4a2d-a303-aae730300915"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:0fe062a1739e4009d8b574405ad590a124fa1de84ed018c19d5662390eab86cc","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"4cb4ee6167eca055b20e1c1d195d971e4818b7b21a1fb0f9553b169b80d54e78","cross_cats_sorted":[],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2026-05-13T20:28:21Z","title_canon_sha256":"694dc2a5dd6a60962b7ae817fc71d38d0f0ae1e103b26a3b5bbc6837e3aca914"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2605.14097","kind":"arxiv","version":1}},"canonical_sha256":"434e976a02654e581dd56a640f55848e16d6e4393c2e8510a969a724699a3b1a","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"434e976a02654e581dd56a640f55848e16d6e4393c2e8510a969a724699a3b1a","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12.140250Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12.140250Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"KOxhQpPn7/fva+qJMAWECA1ejx4EHfXCDlq0JKv5LMQ30v1feKK5djjJguP5AG95vGT4TPsTZRR7dHSe7EIHDQ==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:12.140799Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2605.14097","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":1}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:0fe062a1739e4009d8b574405ad590a124fa1de84ed018c19d5662390eab86cc","sha256:ddf9df1f4356e6f53e62c40cfe07f8bfe9ea0f7b00f3906de020fad1f9cb5cc7"],"state_sha256":"55e08dc5ba8e3aae47dd10617d3f7978ffef96f49e4af62f19a4eb16a8cb59c9"},"bundle_signature":{"signature_status":"signed_v1","algorithm":"ed25519","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signature_b64":"hW8kzYbyzNguSXHt0Widim62BlDCbux3gr+BF2QskoxEgIWCRrPa5JQbn2CAUz73Tw5Giqb3fVTLLRFV20a6Dg==","signed_message":"bundle_sha256_bytes","signed_at":"2026-05-19T01:53:56.202577Z","bundle_sha256":"f0d1ec41cae804c01edd36411bccb4ffe78f109eb4fd4e7677674ec257886d8e"}}