{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2","short_pith_number":"pith:IQJFQKQM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4412582a0c6c8769248bcd198cd3283eac8fe908f351c65e274016680b18fa31","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.09423","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Orthogonal prediction of counterfactual outcomes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Pawe{\\l} Morzywo{\\l}ek, Stijn Vansteelandt","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T22:43:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Orthogonal meta-learners, such as DR-learner, R-learner and IF-learner, are increasingly used to estimate conditional average treatment effects. They improve convergence rates relative to na\\\"{\\i}ve meta-learners (e.g., T-, S- and X-learner) through de-biasing procedures that involve applying standard learners to specifically transformed outcome data. This leads them to disregard the possibly constrained outcome space, which can be particularly problematic for dichotomous outcomes: these typically get transformed to values that are no longer constrained to the unit interval, making it difficul"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.09423","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T22:43:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"26ad50c81f696bf9f55fe4b7593037dafd1a46ce19c82cf903b18a166abe8f4c","abstract_canon_sha256":"fc656017a5a1a4f81f114cd1ed06faafdd48e77f9528326cfbe2714030719378"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799600Z","signature_b64":"gxVrvmxNTWt54C8jRErqwb5PWFkHIt/rS1v3NusZx3OF0/ySVN1SQAjTmOtpjwpAEY9jf2PBngWQwWZDJ/RLCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4412582a0c6c8769248bcd198cd3283eac8fe908f351c65e274016680b18fa31","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799117Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799117Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Orthogonal prediction of counterfactual outcomes","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Pawe{\\l} Morzywo{\\l}ek, Stijn Vansteelandt","submitted_at":"2023-11-15T22:43:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"Orthogonal meta-learners, such as DR-learner, R-learner and IF-learner, are increasingly used to estimate conditional average treatment effects. They improve convergence rates relative to na\\\"{\\i}ve meta-learners (e.g., T-, S- and X-learner) through de-biasing procedures that involve applying standard learners to specifically transformed outcome data. This leads them to disregard the possibly constrained outcome space, which can be particularly problematic for dichotomous outcomes: these typically get transformed to values that are no longer constrained to the unit interval, making it difficul"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.09423","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.09423/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.09423","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.09423v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.09423","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IQJFQKQMNSDW","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IQJFQKQMNSDWSJEL","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IQJFQKQM","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.04274","citing_title":"Orthogonal Representation Learning for Estimating Causal Quantities","ref_index":68,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IQJFQKQM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IQJFQKQM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.09423&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IQJFQKQMNSDWSJELZUMYZUZIH2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:13:27.799177+00:00"}