{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV","short_pith_number":"pith:IQXHXYPN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"442e7be1edc80859c6c761464fcbc3454cbcbc8c97557077e0221db738d42d7e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2304.09977","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"GSpyNetTree: A signal-vs-glitch classifier for gravitational-wave event candidates","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.HE","astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Annudesh Liyanage, Jess McIver, Julian Ding, Raymond Ng, Sofia Alvarez-Lopez","submitted_at":"2023-04-19T21:28:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite achieving sensitivities capable of detecting the extremely small amplitude of gravitational waves (GWs), LIGO and Virgo detector data contain frequent bursts of non-Gaussian transient noise, commonly known as 'glitches'. Glitches come in various time-frequency morphologies, and they are particularly challenging when they mimic the form of real GWs. Given the higher expected event rate in the next observing run (O4), LIGO-Virgo GW event candidate validation will require increased levels of automation. Gravity Spy, a machine learning tool that successfully classified common types of LIGO"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2304.09977","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2023-04-19T21:28:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["astro-ph.HE","astro-ph.IM"],"title_canon_sha256":"dbaa8baa82b999c0cb7b4005a46365b657e26628a0bf87f2ab7c42e68b445d5e","abstract_canon_sha256":"392f9355964a76105e796254e44b839ba435ed7a2eeec7343de29f4659a83334"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691898Z","signature_b64":"vp5UpWIaAhSHy/Rb0WG6E53ZfobU9JTM/R2G946ESezW5Swy8sex19cXUY73hgcUl85pFwET/uQNirYkWfJ5Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"442e7be1edc80859c6c761464fcbc3454cbcbc8c97557077e0221db738d42d7e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691336Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691336Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"GSpyNetTree: A signal-vs-glitch classifier for gravitational-wave event candidates","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["astro-ph.HE","astro-ph.IM"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Annudesh Liyanage, Jess McIver, Julian Ding, Raymond Ng, Sofia Alvarez-Lopez","submitted_at":"2023-04-19T21:28:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Despite achieving sensitivities capable of detecting the extremely small amplitude of gravitational waves (GWs), LIGO and Virgo detector data contain frequent bursts of non-Gaussian transient noise, commonly known as 'glitches'. Glitches come in various time-frequency morphologies, and they are particularly challenging when they mimic the form of real GWs. Given the higher expected event rate in the next observing run (O4), LIGO-Virgo GW event candidate validation will require increased levels of automation. Gravity Spy, a machine learning tool that successfully classified common types of LIGO"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2304.09977","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2304.09977/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2304.09977","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2304.09977v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2304.09977","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IQXHXYPNZAEF","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWH","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IQXHXYPN","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16183","citing_title":"Rapid data quality investigations of gravitational-wave events with the Data Quality Report Builder toolkit","ref_index":41,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.11703","citing_title":"GW240925 and GW250207: Astrophysical Calibration of Gravitational-wave Detectors","ref_index":145,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IQXHXYPN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IQXHXYPN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2304.09977&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IQXHXYPNZAEFTRWHMFDE7S6DIV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:02:52.691420+00:00"}