{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2018:ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W","short_pith_number":"pith:ISTMXLWU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"44a6cbaed451cce13b43f34758d2f4f5bc3a814149683419cb0eccc4c90db808","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1808.00023","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Hamed Nilforoshan, Johann D. Gaebler, Ravi Shroff, Sam Corbett-Davies, Sharad Goel","submitted_at":"2018-07-31T18:38:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"The field of fair machine learning aims to ensure that decisions guided by algorithms are equitable. Over the last decade, several formal, mathematical definitions of fairness have gained prominence. Here we first assemble and categorize these definitions into two broad families: (1) those that constrain the effects of decisions on disparities; and (2) those that constrain the effects of legally protected characteristics, like race and gender, on decisions. We then show, analytically and empirically, that both families of definitions typically result in strongly Pareto dominated decision polic"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1808.00023","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2018-07-31T18:38:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"e36a115421d422d201e8388fd337c639f8fcebd51c450f8d7436e876adaad78f","abstract_canon_sha256":"76edaffb1c73d21ff7f39c830b8bd5a4c88b7ca62a95627119dc1252da713570"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.422303Z","signature_b64":"ioYH+059OXab+a/ycbGjyIO9P54tLZQq/fE4oglpX12lqHObx/iWWSSt+ACrCzeeUU8MQsfYfGVtuFORJyanBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"44a6cbaed451cce13b43f34758d2f4f5bc3a814149683419cb0eccc4c90db808","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421723Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421723Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Hamed Nilforoshan, Johann D. Gaebler, Ravi Shroff, Sam Corbett-Davies, Sharad Goel","submitted_at":"2018-07-31T18:38:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"The field of fair machine learning aims to ensure that decisions guided by algorithms are equitable. Over the last decade, several formal, mathematical definitions of fairness have gained prominence. Here we first assemble and categorize these definitions into two broad families: (1) those that constrain the effects of decisions on disparities; and (2) those that constrain the effects of legally protected characteristics, like race and gender, on decisions. We then show, analytically and empirically, that both families of definitions typically result in strongly Pareto dominated decision polic"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1808.00023","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1808.00023/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1808.00023","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1808.00023v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1808.00023","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"ISTMXLWUKHGO","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"ISTMXLWU","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.23204","citing_title":"Unmasking LAION-5B: Age, Gender, Race, and Emotion Biases in Large-Scale Image Datasets","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21050","citing_title":"Triage Score: A Counterfactual Risk Assessment Instrument","ref_index":42,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1906.11333","citing_title":"Fairness criteria through the lens of directed acyclic graphical models","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.06430","citing_title":"A Causal Bayesian Networks Viewpoint on Fairness","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2008.02275","citing_title":"Aligning AI With Shared Human Values","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.02640","citing_title":"Trustworthy AI Suffers from Invariance Conflicts and Causality is The Solution","ref_index":281,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W","json":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ISTMXLWU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/ISTMXLWU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1808.00023&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/ISTMXLWUKHGOCO2D6NDVRUXU6W/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:45:55.421787+00:00"}