{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ","short_pith_number":"pith:IVM7WGIJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4559fb19091baf359759b85ca45f8bb2466939d617244cd3a2d8cdd806319475","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2510.06182","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Mixing Mechanisms: How Language Models Retrieve Bound Entities In-Context","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Atticus Geiger, Mor Geva, Yoav Gur-Arieh","submitted_at":"2025-10-07T17:44:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"A key component of in-context reasoning is the ability of language models (LMs) to bind entities for later retrieval. For example, an LM might represent \"Ann loves pie\" by binding \"Ann\" to \"pie\", allowing it to later retrieve \"Ann\" when asked \"Who loves pie?\" Prior research on short lists of bound entities found strong evidence that LMs implement such retrieval via a positional mechanism, where \"Ann\" is retrieved based on its position in context. In this work, we find that this mechanism generalizes poorly to more complex settings; as the number of bound entities in context increases, the posi"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2510.06182","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-10-07T17:44:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"70c241c5cad0cbcf473ef1eb38d55f7c7cc88f5f077267bec5cfb46c199a8832","abstract_canon_sha256":"2955cc219313294e5ecd082bb1eb84c6712e50414adc5730bccaa1bc27aa640a"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.428052Z","signature_b64":"d7YbLP8NkDrlNrmmNhKMajo9Vd5/9MsAaPphj8eojygBUEKbiy1cgRgLPrDHYrMTSRPz9CqDXnFnrh9D0iCdAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4559fb19091baf359759b85ca45f8bb2466939d617244cd3a2d8cdd806319475","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427580Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427580Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Mixing Mechanisms: How Language Models Retrieve Bound Entities In-Context","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Atticus Geiger, Mor Geva, Yoav Gur-Arieh","submitted_at":"2025-10-07T17:44:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"A key component of in-context reasoning is the ability of language models (LMs) to bind entities for later retrieval. For example, an LM might represent \"Ann loves pie\" by binding \"Ann\" to \"pie\", allowing it to later retrieve \"Ann\" when asked \"Who loves pie?\" Prior research on short lists of bound entities found strong evidence that LMs implement such retrieval via a positional mechanism, where \"Ann\" is retrieved based on its position in context. In this work, we find that this mechanism generalizes poorly to more complex settings; as the number of bound entities in context increases, the posi"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2510.06182","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2510.06182/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2510.06182","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2510.06182v2","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2510.06182","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IVM7WGIJDOXT","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2Z","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IVM7WGIJ","created_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":5,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.01750","citing_title":"Talk is Cheap, Communication is Hard: Dynamic Grounding Failures and Repair in Multi-Agent Negotiation","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09129","citing_title":"Data-driven Circuit Discovery for Interpretability of Language Models","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21139","citing_title":"Slot Machines: How LLMs Keep Track of Multiple Entities","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19052","citing_title":"Cell-Based Representation of Relational Binding in Language Models","ref_index":76,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.02234","citing_title":"Bucketing the Good Apples: A Method for Diagnosing and Improving Causal Abstraction","ref_index":10,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IVM7WGIJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IVM7WGIJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2510.06182&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IVM7WGIJDOXTLF2ZXBOKIX4LWJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-29T01:04:56.427635+00:00"}