{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX","short_pith_number":"pith:IX444ZYM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"45f9ce670cdbf2448e260585389489cdd45722211014fbe344a6f6a3169c409e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.19212","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"When Ethics and Payoffs Diverge: LLM Agents in Morally Charged Social Dilemmas","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bernhard Sch\\\"olkopf, David Guzman Piedrahita, Emanuel Tewolde, Rada Mihalcea, Steffen Backmann, Zhijing Jin","submitted_at":"2025-05-25T16:19:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their use in complex agentic roles, involving decision-making with humans or other agents, making ethical alignment a key AI safety concern. While prior work has examined both LLMs' moral judgment and strategic behavior in social dilemmas, there is limited understanding of how they act when moral imperatives directly conflict with rewards or incentives. To investigate this, we introduce Moral Behavior in Social Dilemma Simulation (MoralSim) and evaluate how LLMs behave in the prisoner's dilemma and public goods game with morally char"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.19212","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-05-25T16:19:24Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"ac4d2c2cb2dd63fefccbba4e68c0e06fee88f11ff3af1923f68ad5a05365772c","abstract_canon_sha256":"a323746e89c3679c8424be7673eb30edcc7d456a46b1de91e4db6090d0a60b72"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.506268Z","signature_b64":"2LEAF9lfuqOpV2ffkBpAuBtsBynf15lZoTwkTV4dtmh8r0v4YL2KpTHrSYi0djAu2G2Hu8R4E5QkHgomtmEcAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"45f9ce670cdbf2448e260585389489cdd45722211014fbe344a6f6a3169c409e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505684Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505684Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"When Ethics and Payoffs Diverge: LLM Agents in Morally Charged Social Dilemmas","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bernhard Sch\\\"olkopf, David Guzman Piedrahita, Emanuel Tewolde, Rada Mihalcea, Steffen Backmann, Zhijing Jin","submitted_at":"2025-05-25T16:19:24Z","abstract_excerpt":"Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have enabled their use in complex agentic roles, involving decision-making with humans or other agents, making ethical alignment a key AI safety concern. While prior work has examined both LLMs' moral judgment and strategic behavior in social dilemmas, there is limited understanding of how they act when moral imperatives directly conflict with rewards or incentives. To investigate this, we introduce Moral Behavior in Social Dilemma Simulation (MoralSim) and evaluate how LLMs behave in the prisoner's dilemma and public goods game with morally char"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.19212","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.19212/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.19212","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.19212v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.19212","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IX444ZYM3PZE","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IX444ZYM3PZEJDRG","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IX444ZYM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":3,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28456","citing_title":"Is Lying an Emergent Behaviour in LLMs? Evidence from Gaslighting AI agents in a Sustainability Game","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12411","citing_title":"Predicting Decisions of AI Agents from Limited Interaction through Text-Tabular Modeling","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.11721","citing_title":"Evaluating Cooperation in LLM Social Groups through Elected Leadership","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IX444ZYM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IX444ZYM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.19212&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IX444ZYM3PZEJDRGAWCTRFEJZX/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:26.505746+00:00"}