{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB","short_pith_number":"pith:IYG2UXQT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"460daa5e1360cfb443b0d6490222d52051bfc8ce13d37f8bae32c39c94d5a665","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2606.05120","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Colin B. Fogarty, Gongjun Xu, Mengqi Lin","submitted_at":"2026-06-03T17:25:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Sensitivity analysis asks how strong unmeasured confounding needs to be to explain away an observational study's conclusion. The conventional approach in matched studies conducts inference conditional upon the potential outcomes as well as both observed and unobserved confounders, and then finds the worst-case distribution for the conditional treatment assignments across all possible realizations of the unobserved confounder. The resulting worst-case allocation imagines strong, near perfect, correlations between the potential outcomes and hidden bias. We propose a stochastic sensitivity analys"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2606.05120","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2026-06-03T17:25:15Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"83a1d8ebc27bdddad6bd534e4ae6bbe715fbb488fab7dd0ee1875607062598b5","abstract_canon_sha256":"cf8ec4deaef499ad4e256249786f40ec4193a511093c3354e66b47d2c1eafd36"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084481Z","signature_b64":"ByAg8+L2Bp6Z4BVlZo3GSQoeSfIYNKUamKaWeBr8NE7Iyg9rLN6uMtYFlTLtUOWEVEw72FAfaUhzuG9gaICZCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"460daa5e1360cfb443b0d6490222d52051bfc8ce13d37f8bae32c39c94d5a665","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084015Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084015Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Stochastic Sensitivity Analysis for Matched Observational Studies","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Colin B. Fogarty, Gongjun Xu, Mengqi Lin","submitted_at":"2026-06-03T17:25:15Z","abstract_excerpt":"Sensitivity analysis asks how strong unmeasured confounding needs to be to explain away an observational study's conclusion. The conventional approach in matched studies conducts inference conditional upon the potential outcomes as well as both observed and unobserved confounders, and then finds the worst-case distribution for the conditional treatment assignments across all possible realizations of the unobserved confounder. The resulting worst-case allocation imagines strong, near perfect, correlations between the potential outcomes and hidden bias. We propose a stochastic sensitivity analys"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2606.05120","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2606.05120/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2606.05120","created_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2606.05120v1","created_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2606.05120","created_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IYG2UXQTMDH3","created_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q","created_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IYG2UXQT","created_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IYG2UXQT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IYG2UXQT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2606.05120&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IYG2UXQTMDH3IQ5Q2ZEQEIWVEB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-04T01:10:07.084079+00:00"}