{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC","short_pith_number":"pith:IZSQHDFY","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4665038cb8d19a92880187eac691ae608fbbd294a721dcae8deddf8e6ef6b4e0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2310.02603","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Detecting a late changepoint in the preferential attachment model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.PR","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Gianmarco Bet, Kay Bogerd, Remco van der Hofstad, Rui M. Castro","submitted_at":"2023-10-04T06:19:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivated by the problem of detecting a change in the evolution of a network, we consider the preferential attachment random graph model with a time-dependent attachment function. Our goal is to detect whether the attachment mechanism changed over time, based on a single snapshot of the network and without directly observable information about the dynamics. We cast this question as a hypothesis testing problem, where the null hypothesis is a preferential attachment model with a constant affine attachment parameter $\\delta_0$, and the alternative hypothesis is a preferential attachment model wh"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2310.02603","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"math.ST","submitted_at":"2023-10-04T06:19:58Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.PR","stat.TH"],"title_canon_sha256":"9e279f5590eb0067d4b49791f109bcb569cbaf96efd19e5b95384fc4e3a899ed","abstract_canon_sha256":"79131f8313383b63f69229d743abde8425cc3171792bdab4024af7c12c0e2228"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887582Z","signature_b64":"HSbqvuSdGmmVJctfJcx4dAT9y/uZS66L6g37BPsAD6/ylOEejkSLFRnaXqbFaZLUNcWfha3YZi3UIf7acrTgCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4665038cb8d19a92880187eac691ae608fbbd294a721dcae8deddf8e6ef6b4e0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887027Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887027Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Detecting a late changepoint in the preferential attachment model","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math.PR","stat.TH"],"primary_cat":"math.ST","authors_text":"Gianmarco Bet, Kay Bogerd, Remco van der Hofstad, Rui M. Castro","submitted_at":"2023-10-04T06:19:58Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivated by the problem of detecting a change in the evolution of a network, we consider the preferential attachment random graph model with a time-dependent attachment function. Our goal is to detect whether the attachment mechanism changed over time, based on a single snapshot of the network and without directly observable information about the dynamics. We cast this question as a hypothesis testing problem, where the null hypothesis is a preferential attachment model with a constant affine attachment parameter $\\delta_0$, and the alternative hypothesis is a preferential attachment model wh"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2310.02603","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2310.02603/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2310.02603","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2310.02603v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2310.02603","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"IZSQHDFY2GNJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"IZSQHDFY2GNJFCAB","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"IZSQHDFY","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.00514","citing_title":"A Proof of The Changepoint Detection Threshold Conjecture in Preferential Attachment Models","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IZSQHDFY"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/IZSQHDFY","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2310.02603&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/IZSQHDFY2GNJFCABQ7VMNENOMC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:57:11.887092+00:00"}