{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE","short_pith_number":"pith:J4G2RG2A","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4f0da89b40af0157e3b336abacc6fe990841b2063fe5a9164ab7a0d0c9c573cc","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.13858","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Distributional reasoning in LLMs: Parallel reasoning processes in multi-hop reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amir Feder, Ariel Goldstein, Yuval Shalev","submitted_at":"2024-06-19T21:36:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have shown an impressive ability to perform tasks believed to require thought processes. When the model does not document an explicit thought process, it becomes difficult to understand the processes occurring within its hidden layers and to determine if these processes can be referred to as reasoning. We introduce a novel and interpretable analysis of internal multi-hop reasoning processes in LLMs. We demonstrate that the prediction process for compositional reasoning questions can be modeled using a simple linear transformation between two semantic category space"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.13858","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2024-06-19T21:36:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a7e5b98cf378ee8f850144b10cd21e843d3c417de14631e5e1d3af0b017f2b01","abstract_canon_sha256":"f64b5aead70119fd0fea7632a024be22c48790d4ca09749579005444ce09ec72"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430828Z","signature_b64":"yiqeQa2iWgiJswWG0Xva7M6j+lbmH3fykD7xtRUQ/6WPQh3Agb8lpDK0EPNW1qBljzOKmJqR2BgzEvEv2+urCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4f0da89b40af0157e3b336abacc6fe990841b2063fe5a9164ab7a0d0c9c573cc","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430256Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430256Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Distributional reasoning in LLMs: Parallel reasoning processes in multi-hop reasoning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Amir Feder, Ariel Goldstein, Yuval Shalev","submitted_at":"2024-06-19T21:36:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models (LLMs) have shown an impressive ability to perform tasks believed to require thought processes. When the model does not document an explicit thought process, it becomes difficult to understand the processes occurring within its hidden layers and to determine if these processes can be referred to as reasoning. We introduce a novel and interpretable analysis of internal multi-hop reasoning processes in LLMs. We demonstrate that the prediction process for compositional reasoning questions can be modeled using a simple linear transformation between two semantic category space"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.13858","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.13858/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.13858","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.13858v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.13858","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"J4G2RG2AV4AV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5T","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"J4G2RG2A","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06673","citing_title":"Uncertainty-Aware LLM-Guided Policy Shaping for Sparse-Reward Reinforcement Learning","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.17837","citing_title":"The Silent Thought: Modeling Internal Cognition in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models via Latent Reasoning","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.01685","citing_title":"How Do Language Models Compose Functions?","ref_index":35,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2603.17837","citing_title":"The Silent Thought: Modeling Internal Cognition in Full-Duplex Spoken Dialogue Models via Latent Reasoning","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.06769","citing_title":"Training Large Language Models to Reason in a Continuous Latent Space","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08299","citing_title":"SeLaR: Selective Latent Reasoning in Large Language Models","ref_index":32,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J4G2RG2A"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J4G2RG2A","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.13858&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/J4G2RG2AV4AVPY5TG2V2ZRX6TE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:34:35.430325+00:00"}