{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2012:J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB","short_pith_number":"pith:J6OSTLZE","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4f9d29af2458d4eaa9cd2cbfe0f6f3686dd10d80b9f3215a0e7eef10455e4892","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1208.2175","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An approach to describing and analysing bulk biological annotation quality: a case study using UniProtKB","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR","q-bio.GN"],"primary_cat":"cs.CE","authors_text":"Colin S. Gillespie, Daniel Swan, Michael J. Bell, Phillip Lord","submitted_at":"2012-08-10T13:48:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivation: Annotations are a key feature of many biological databases, used to convey our knowledge of a sequence to the reader. Ideally, annotations are curated manually, however manual curation is costly, time consuming and requires expert knowledge and training. Given these issues and the exponential increase of data, many databases implement automated annotation pipelines in an attempt to avoid un-annotated entries. Both manual and automated annotations vary in quality between databases and annotators, making assessment of annotation reliability problematic for users. The community lacks "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1208.2175","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CE","submitted_at":"2012-08-10T13:48:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.IR","q-bio.GN"],"title_canon_sha256":"42af1608b482b2c20417600e9e8f2974669e67b6d9fc0ba628d4a3963f8035d8","abstract_canon_sha256":"2ca5d10e40485e6309166bfd359e106af4f71ba1eb0350cf99723b0f461a8c73"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619754Z","signature_b64":"Z73KyXbMafPz5tN4jy/MaNvaGnsGZBN2UWVYzLgvg32K8NlVoyXZYfnT0xncdqad44WRgfj4j4WHtKvXCjNLDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4f9d29af2458d4eaa9cd2cbfe0f6f3686dd10d80b9f3215a0e7eef10455e4892","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619095Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619095Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An approach to describing and analysing bulk biological annotation quality: a case study using UniProtKB","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IR","q-bio.GN"],"primary_cat":"cs.CE","authors_text":"Colin S. Gillespie, Daniel Swan, Michael J. Bell, Phillip Lord","submitted_at":"2012-08-10T13:48:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivation: Annotations are a key feature of many biological databases, used to convey our knowledge of a sequence to the reader. Ideally, annotations are curated manually, however manual curation is costly, time consuming and requires expert knowledge and training. Given these issues and the exponential increase of data, many databases implement automated annotation pipelines in an attempt to avoid un-annotated entries. Both manual and automated annotations vary in quality between databases and annotators, making assessment of annotation reliability problematic for users. The community lacks "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1208.2175","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1208.2175","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1208.2175v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1208.2175","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619210+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"J6OSTLZELDKO","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:11.947152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"J6OSTLZELDKOVKON","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:11.947152+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"J6OSTLZE","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:27:11.947152+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J6OSTLZE"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J6OSTLZE","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1208.2175&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/J6OSTLZELDKOVKONFS76B5XTNB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619210+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:15:32.619210+00:00"}