{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN","short_pith_number":"pith:J6UR67LI","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4fa91f7d6872a315bef93139f5a5797b7f9ccc06b8ca8de55129aa9e84559d4e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2206.04716","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Gender and Robots: A Literature Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.RO","authors_text":"David Gray Widder","submitted_at":"2022-06-09T18:15:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Here, I ask what we can learn about how gender affects how people engage with robots. I review 46 empirical studies of social robots, published 2018 or earlier, which report on the gender of their participants or the perceived or intended gender of the robot, or both, and perform some analysis with respect to either participant or robot gender. From these studies, I find that robots are by default perceived as male, that robots absorb human gender stereotypes, and that men tend to engage with robots more than women. I highlight open questions about how such gender effects may be different in y"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2206.04716","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.RO","submitted_at":"2022-06-09T18:15:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"9bd77cc5566a1c854845e9088eb522e21f611e70697e498e5ab3f412d1081094","abstract_canon_sha256":"9c94d90ab58f7fc4f1f6e1bda03b9bb6f4063ce396d436aa81c71c1523d0fdb1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971862Z","signature_b64":"DPcsMJ1kT1Xxzz7AkAyGJzXIWyTX4SQiqY7KxiDoj+T7tP+//8BswCcSkvK37tz3iCTVTc6XGeGe6RsG7UA9Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4fa91f7d6872a315bef93139f5a5797b7f9ccc06b8ca8de55129aa9e84559d4e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971153Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971153Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Gender and Robots: A Literature Review","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.RO","authors_text":"David Gray Widder","submitted_at":"2022-06-09T18:15:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"Here, I ask what we can learn about how gender affects how people engage with robots. I review 46 empirical studies of social robots, published 2018 or earlier, which report on the gender of their participants or the perceived or intended gender of the robot, or both, and perform some analysis with respect to either participant or robot gender. From these studies, I find that robots are by default perceived as male, that robots absorb human gender stereotypes, and that men tend to engage with robots more than women. I highlight open questions about how such gender effects may be different in y"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2206.04716","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2206.04716/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2206.04716","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2206.04716v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2206.04716","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"J6UR67LIOKRR","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"J6UR67LI","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.12507","citing_title":"Sense and Sensibility: What makes a social robot convincing to high-school students?","ref_index":65,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN","json":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J6UR67LI"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J6UR67LI","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2206.04716&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/J6UR67LIOKRRLPXZGE47LJLZPN/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:36:36.971235+00:00"}