{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG","short_pith_number":"pith:J7HJVSHD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4fce9ac8e3472fcd9f05619f0e4241a18c44be9b96cf29ee1b2472ced57361b3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2011.01956","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanisms","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Brendan Lucier, Jack Z. Wang, Nicole Immorlica, Nika Haghtalab","submitted_at":"2020-11-03T19:00:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivated by applications such as college admission and insurance rate determination, we propose an evaluation problem where the inputs are controlled by strategic individuals who can modify their features at a cost. A learner can only partially observe the features, and aims to classify individuals with respect to a quality score. The goal is to design an evaluation mechanism that maximizes the overall quality score, i.e., welfare, in the population, taking any strategic updating into account. We further study the algorithmic aspect of finding the welfare maximizing evaluation mechanism under"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2011.01956","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.GT","submitted_at":"2020-11-03T19:00:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"c345783187b108ed515d16637633f0e55fbea04942992e0015a25f84f1e42ef3","abstract_canon_sha256":"aed2b3208eb7514a82109cbff450ae7c72b11152536a44edcf3212d689ffe981"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.074073Z","signature_b64":"5iBVRIe5ZKQr14ADduEuZA5MPuPiKHbminwwpqI1BOqs1KRvxwJP4Of5OJDvEuXsXreXEn2KIfE/WP4lDKtrDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4fce9ac8e3472fcd9f05619f0e4241a18c44be9b96cf29ee1b2472ced57361b3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073411Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073411Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Maximizing Welfare with Incentive-Aware Evaluation Mechanisms","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.GT","authors_text":"Brendan Lucier, Jack Z. Wang, Nicole Immorlica, Nika Haghtalab","submitted_at":"2020-11-03T19:00:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Motivated by applications such as college admission and insurance rate determination, we propose an evaluation problem where the inputs are controlled by strategic individuals who can modify their features at a cost. A learner can only partially observe the features, and aims to classify individuals with respect to a quality score. The goal is to design an evaluation mechanism that maximizes the overall quality score, i.e., welfare, in the population, taking any strategic updating into account. We further study the algorithmic aspect of finding the welfare maximizing evaluation mechanism under"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2011.01956","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2011.01956/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2011.01956","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2011.01956v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2011.01956","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"J7HJVSHDI4X4","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"J7HJVSHDI4X43HYF","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"J7HJVSHD","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00826","citing_title":"Partial Fairness Awareness: Belief-Guided Strategic Mechanism for Strategic Agents","ref_index":50,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.00827","citing_title":"Beyond Independent Manipulation: Individual Fairness-aware Strategic Classification with Peer Imitation","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01198","citing_title":"Linear Strategic Classification with Endogenous Improvements","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19662","citing_title":"When Tabular Foundation Models Meet Strategic Tabular Data: A Prior Alignment Approach","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19674","citing_title":"Beyond Rational Illusion: Behaviorally Realistic Strategic Classification","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.04202","citing_title":"Sequential Strategic Classification with Multi-Stage Selective Classifiers","ref_index":14,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J7HJVSHD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/J7HJVSHD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2011.01956&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/J7HJVSHDI4X43HYFMGPQ4QSBUG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:49:07.073495+00:00"}