{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL","short_pith_number":"pith:JB43TCY4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"4879b98b1cc9b8b6743ef499448d3132cffeda37a3da6abf77f0f1d57f81728f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2512.09850","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Conformal bandits: bringing statistical validity and reward efficiency under weak arm separability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Nina Deliu, Simone Cuonzo","submitted_at":"2025-12-10T17:34:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We introduce Conformal Bandits, a novel framework integrating Conformal Prediction (CP) into bandit problems, a classic paradigm for sequential decision-making under uncertainty. Traditional regret-minimisation bandit strategies like Thompson Sampling and Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) typically rely on distributional assumptions or asymptotic guarantees; further, they remain largely focused on regret, neglecting their statistical properties. We address this gap. Through the adoption of CP, we bridge the regret-minimising potential of a decision-making bandit policy with statistical guarantees i"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2512.09850","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-12-10T17:34:55Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"bcfbd8574a0a1dc823e503038f17d651b29cb79d4e0a3af50096ec4390561e53","abstract_canon_sha256":"08ccb6dc0ba33e8a1a48f0beb8df3450cc453846246e3e55be0621cdc723c98f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868590Z","signature_b64":"SsL7pqBed5xQELjwdD5CY3tZTbpCyHwTugajT0tPJ+t6UW0OJs1D95Z2HCh9BhB1Q5Tn4DKW+vguAi2csMuuCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"4879b98b1cc9b8b6743ef499448d3132cffeda37a3da6abf77f0f1d57f81728f","last_reissued_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.866467Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.866467Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Conformal bandits: bringing statistical validity and reward efficiency under weak arm separability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Nina Deliu, Simone Cuonzo","submitted_at":"2025-12-10T17:34:55Z","abstract_excerpt":"We introduce Conformal Bandits, a novel framework integrating Conformal Prediction (CP) into bandit problems, a classic paradigm for sequential decision-making under uncertainty. Traditional regret-minimisation bandit strategies like Thompson Sampling and Upper Confidence Bound (UCB) typically rely on distributional assumptions or asymptotic guarantees; further, they remain largely focused on regret, neglecting their statistical properties. We address this gap. Through the adoption of CP, we bridge the regret-minimising potential of a decision-making bandit policy with statistical guarantees i"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2512.09850","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2512.09850/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2512.09850","created_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2512.09850v2","created_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2512.09850","created_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"JB43TCY4ZG4L","created_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B6","created_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"JB43TCY4","created_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.07115","citing_title":"Conformal-Style Quantile Analyses for Stochastic Bandits","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JB43TCY4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/JB43TCY4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2512.09850&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/JB43TCY4ZG4LM5B66SMUJDJRGL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00","updated_at":"2026-08-04T01:58:10.868088+00:00"}